Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 30;16(9):e0257753.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257753. eCollection 2021.

How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?

Affiliations

How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?

Lison Bouhours et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to examine whether in Hot, i.e., affectively charged contexts, or cool, i.e., affectively neutral contexts, inhibitory control capacity increases or decreases under social evaluation in adolescents and adults. In two experiments, adolescents and young adults completed two Stroop-like tasks under either a social evaluation condition or an alone condition. The social evaluation condition comprised the presence of a peer (Experiment 1) or an expert (Experiment 2) playing the role of an evaluator, while under the alone condition, the task was performed alone. In the Cool Stroop task, participants had to refrain from reading color names to identify the ink color in which the words were printed. In the Hot Stroop task, participants had to determine the emotional expression conveyed by faces from the NimStim database while ignoring the emotion word displayed beneath. The results were similar in both experiments. In adolescents, social evaluation by a peer (Experiment 1) or by an expert (Experience 2) facilitated Hot but not cool inhibitory control. In adults, social evaluation had no effect on Hot or cool inhibitory control. The present findings expand our understanding of the favorable influence of socioemotional context on Hot inhibitory control during adolescence in healthy individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blakemore S. J., & Robbins T. W. Decision-making in the adolescent brain. Nature neuroscience. 2012; 15(9), 1184 doi: 10.1038/nn.3177 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Houdé O., & Borst G. Evidence for an inhibitory-control theory of the reasoning brain. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2015; 9, 148. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00148 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roell M., Viarouge A., Houde O., & Borst G. Inhibitory control and decimal number comparison in school-aged children. PloS one. 2017; 12(11). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188276 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cassotti M., Aïte A., Osmont A., Houdé O., & Borst G. What have we learned about the processes involved in the Iowa Gambling Task from developmental studies?. Frontiers in psychology. 2014; 5, 915. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00915 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cassotti M., Agogué M., Camarda A., Houdé O., & Borst G. Inhibitory control as a core process of creative problem solving and idea generation from childhood to adulthood. New directions for child and adolescent development. 2016; (151), 61–72. doi: 10.1002/cad.20153 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types