How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?
- PMID: 34591880
- PMCID: PMC8483316
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257753
How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to examine whether in Hot, i.e., affectively charged contexts, or cool, i.e., affectively neutral contexts, inhibitory control capacity increases or decreases under social evaluation in adolescents and adults. In two experiments, adolescents and young adults completed two Stroop-like tasks under either a social evaluation condition or an alone condition. The social evaluation condition comprised the presence of a peer (Experiment 1) or an expert (Experiment 2) playing the role of an evaluator, while under the alone condition, the task was performed alone. In the Cool Stroop task, participants had to refrain from reading color names to identify the ink color in which the words were printed. In the Hot Stroop task, participants had to determine the emotional expression conveyed by faces from the NimStim database while ignoring the emotion word displayed beneath. The results were similar in both experiments. In adolescents, social evaluation by a peer (Experiment 1) or by an expert (Experience 2) facilitated Hot but not cool inhibitory control. In adults, social evaluation had no effect on Hot or cool inhibitory control. The present findings expand our understanding of the favorable influence of socioemotional context on Hot inhibitory control during adolescence in healthy individuals.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Influence of Social Exclusion on Cool and Hot Inhibitory Control in Chinese College Students.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 30;20(3):2433. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032433. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36767798 Free PMC article.
-
Adolescents' inhibitory control: keep it cool or lose control.Dev Sci. 2018 Jan;21(1). doi: 10.1111/desc.12491. Epub 2016 Nov 23. Dev Sci. 2018. PMID: 27882631
-
Differential effects of mindfulness meditation and cognitive training on cool and hot inhibitory control in children and adolescents.J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Nov;235:105741. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105741. Epub 2023 Jul 11. J Exp Child Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37441988
-
Differential inter-trial effects in the visual search of children, adolescents, and young adults.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Oct 2. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018. PMID: 30286429
-
The Stroop effect at 80: The competition between stimulus control and cognitive control.J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 Jan;105(1):3-13. doi: 10.1002/jeab.194. J Exp Anal Behav. 2016. PMID: 26781048 Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of moral identity on facial emotion processing in adolescents with hearing loss: an event-related potentials study.Front Neurosci. 2025 Mar 26;19:1559627. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1559627. eCollection 2025. Front Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40206411 Free PMC article.
-
Neurobiological correlates of the social and emotional impact of peer victimization: A review.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 1;13:866926. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.866926. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35978845 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Influence of Social Exclusion on Cool and Hot Inhibitory Control in Chinese College Students.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 30;20(3):2433. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032433. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36767798 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources