Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Mar;161(3):651-661.
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.09.021. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

Significant Spirometric Transitions and Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry Among Ever Smokers

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Significant Spirometric Transitions and Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry Among Ever Smokers

Emily S Wan et al. Chest. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Emerging data from longitudinal studies suggest that preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), defined by proportionate reductions in FEV1 and FVC, is a heterogeneous population with frequent transitions to other lung function categories relative to individuals with normal and obstructive spirometry. Controversy regarding the clinical significance of these transitions exists (eg, whether transitions merely reflect measurement variability or noise).

Research question: Are individuals with PRISm enriched for transitions associated with substantial changes in lung function?

Study design and methods: Current and former smokers enrolled in the Genetic Epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) study with spirometry available in phases 1 through 3 (enrollment, 5-year follow-up, and 10-year follow-up) were analyzed. Postbronchodilator lung function categories were as follows: PRISm (FEV1 < 80% predicted with FEV1/FVC ratio ≥ 0.7), Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease grade 0 (FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted and FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7), and obstruction (FEV1/FVC < 0.7). Significant transition status was affirmative if a subject belonged to two or more spirometric categories and had > 10% change in FEV1 % predicted and/or FVC % predicted between consecutive visits. Ever-PRISm was present if a subject had PRISm at any visit. Logistic regression examined the association between significant transitions and ever-PRISm status, adjusted for age, sex, race, FEV1 % predicted, current smoking, pack-years, BMI, and ever-positive bronchodilator response.

Results: Among subjects with complete data (N = 1,775) over 10.1 ± 0.4 years of follow-up, the prevalence of PRISm remained consistent (10.4%-11.3%) between phases 1 through 3, but nearly one-half of subjects with PRISm transitioned into or out of PRISm at each visit. Among all subjects, 19.7% had a significant transition; ever-PRISm was a significant predictor of significant transitions (unadjusted OR, 10.3; 95% CI, 7.9-13.5; adjusted OR, 14.9; 95% CI, 10.9-20.7). Results were similar with additional adjustment for radiographic emphysema and gas trapping, when lower limit of normal criteria were used to define lung function categories, and when FEV1 alone (regardless of change in FVC % predicted) was used to define significant transitions.

Interpretation: PRISm is an unstable group, with frequent significant transitions to both obstruction and normal spirometry over time.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT000608764; URL: www.

Clinicaltrials: gov.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00608764.

Keywords: COPD; epidemiology; lung function; restrictive spirometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rates of simple transitions between lung function categories by study visit among subjects with spirometry data at all three visits in COPDGene (N = 1,775). Lung function categories were defined as follows: PRISm (FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7 and FEV1 < 80% predicted), obstructed (FEV1/FVC < 0.7), and GOLD grade 0 (FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7 and FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted). F/U = follow-up; GOLD = Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; PRISm = preserved ratio impaired spirometry.

Comment in

References

    1. Wan E.S., Castaldi P.J., Cho M.H., et al. Epidemiology, genetics, and subtyping of preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) in COPDGene. Respir Res. 2014;15(1):89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Backman H., Eriksson B., Hedman L., et al. Restrictive spirometric pattern in the general adult population: methods of defining the condition and consequences on prevalence. Respir Med. 2016;120:116–123. - PubMed
    1. Schwartz A., Arnold N., Skinner B., et al. Preserved ratio impaired spirometry in a spirometry database. Respir Care. 2021;66(1):58–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mannino D.M., Buist A.S., Petty T.L., Enright P.L., Redd S.C. Lung function and mortality in the United States: data from the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey follow up study. Thorax. 2003;58(5):388–393. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mannino D.M., McBurnie M.A., Tan W., et al. Restricted spirometry in the Burden of Lung Disease Study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16(10):1405–1411. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data