Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 1;34(4):487-500.
doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.4.487.

Erector spinae plane block for spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

Erector spinae plane block for spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiao Liang et al. Korean J Pain. .

Abstract

Background: Although the erector spinae plane block has been used in various truncal surgical procedures, its clinical benefits in patients undergoing spinal surgery remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical benefits of erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for randomized controlled trials comparing the erector spinae plane block with a nonblocked control for spinal surgery.

Results: Twelve studies encompassing 696 subjects were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. We found that the erector spinae plane block decreased postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in the postoperative and intraoperative periods. Moreover, it prolonged the time to the first rescue analgesic, reduced the number of patients who required rescue analgesia, and lowered the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, it did not exhibit efficacy in decreasing the incidence of urinary retention and itching or shortening the length of hospital stays, or the time to first ambulation.

Conclusions: Erector spinae plane block improves analgesic efficacy among patients undergoing spinal surgery compared with nonblocked controls; however, there is insufficient evidence regarding the benefits of erector spinae plane block for rapid recovery.

Keywords: Analgesia; Analgesics; Diskectomy; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; Erector Spinae Plane Block; Laminectomy; Meta-Analysis; Nerve Block; Neurosurgical Procedures; Opioid; Pain; Postoperative; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Randomized Controlled Trial..

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias for each item according to RoB 2 [11].
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary plot of quality assessment of each study included according to RoB 2 [11].
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Funnel plot of 24- and 48-hour cumulative postoperative intravenous morphine equivalent consumption in the erector spinae plane block group versus the control group. SE: standard error, MD: mean difference.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot of 24-hour and 48-hour cumulative postoperative intravenous morphine equivalent consumption (mg). ESPB: erector spinae plane block, SD: standard deviation, IV: inverse variance, CI: confidence interval, df: degree of freedom.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot of pain score at rest at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours. ESPB: erector spinae plane block, SD: standard deviation, IV: inverse variance, CI: confidence interval, df: degree of freedom.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Forest plot of pain score at movement at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours. ESPB: erector spinae plane block, SD: standard deviation, IV: inverse variance, CI: confidence interval, df: degree of freedom.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Forest plot of overall pain score at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours. ESPB: erector spinae plane block, SD: standard deviation, IV: inverse variance, CI: confidence interval, df: degree of freedom.

References

    1. Bajwa SJ, Haldar R. Pain management following spinal surgeries: an appraisal of the available options. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2015;6:105–10. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.161589. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurd MF, Kreitz T, Schroeder G, Vaccaro AR. The role of multimodal analgesia in spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25:260–8. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen BE, Hartman MB, Wade JT, Miller JS, Gilbert R, Chapman TM. Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion. Patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:1892–6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199708150-00016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mergeay M, Verster A, Van Aken D, Vercauteren M. Regional versus general anesthesia for spine surgery. A comprehensive review. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2015;66:1–9. - PubMed
    1. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:621–7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources