Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 30;11(1):19487.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99076-4.

Diagnostic accuracy of multiplex polymerase chain reaction on tissue biopsies in periprosthetic joint infections

Affiliations

Diagnostic accuracy of multiplex polymerase chain reaction on tissue biopsies in periprosthetic joint infections

Igor Lazic et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) currently relies on cultures, which are time-consuming and often fail. Multiplex PCR assays promise reliable and prompt results, but have been heterogeneously evaluated. In this study, we analyse multiplex PCR in pathogen identification using only tissue biopsies. 42 patients after revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee were evaluated using multiplex PCR to identify microorganisms. The patients were classified according to the diagnostic criteria published by Zimmerli et al. and the results were compared to the respective microbiological cultures. PJI was detected in 15 patients and 27 revisions were aseptic. The multiplex PCR of tissue biopsies had a sensitivity of 0.3 (95% CI 0.12-0.62), a specificity of 1.0 (0.87-1.0), a positive predictive value of 1.0 (0.48-1.0) and a negative predictive value of 0.73 (0.56-0.86). The diagnostic accuracy of multiplex PCR on tissue biopsy samples is low in comparison to routine microbiological cultures. The evaluation of tissue biopsies using multiplex PCR was prone to false negative results. However, multiplex PCR assays have the advantage of rapid pathogen identification. We therefore recommend further investigation of multiplex PCR in the setting of suspected PJI with a careful choice of specimens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Izakovicova P, Borens O, Trampuz A. Periprosthetic joint infection: Current concepts and outlook. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4:482–494. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180092. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parvizi J, et al. The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: An evidence-based and validated criteria. J. Arthroplasty. 2018;33:1309–1314.e1302. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parvizi J, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: From the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011;469:2992–2994. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mühlhofer HML, et al. Prosthetic joint infection development of an evidence-based diagnostic algorithm. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2017;22:8. doi: 10.1186/s40001-017-0245-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siljander MP, Sobh AH, Baker KC, Baker EA, Kaplan LM. Multidrug-resistant organisms in the setting of periprosthetic joint infection-diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. J. Arthroplasty. 2018;33:185–194. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.045. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types