Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e945-e946.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005222.

Comment on: The Impact of Prehabilitation on Patient Outcomes in Hepatobiliary, Colorectal, and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A PRISMA-Accordant Meta-analysis

Julio F Fiore Jr, Chelsia Gillis  1 , Nawar Touma  2 , Hiba Elhaj  3
Affiliations
Comment

Comment on: The Impact of Prehabilitation on Patient Outcomes in Hepatobiliary, Colorectal, and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A PRISMA-Accordant Meta-analysis

Julio F Fiore Jr et al. Ann Surg. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. Lambert JE, Hayes LD, Keegan TJ, et al. The impact of prehabilitation on patient outcomes in hepatobiliary, colorectal, and upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a PRISMA-accordant meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2021; 274:70–77.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6:e1000097.
    1. Annals of Surgery. Online Submission and Review System. 2021; Available at: https://edmgr.ovid.com/annsurg/accounts/ifauth.htm . Accessed July 21, 2021.
    1. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 2017; 358:j4008.
    1. da Costa BR, Hilfiker R, Egger M. PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66:75–77.