Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;39(5):595-604.
doi: 10.1002/hon.2929. Epub 2021 Oct 1.

A perspective on prognostic models in chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of targeted agents

Affiliations

A perspective on prognostic models in chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of targeted agents

Stefano Molica et al. Hematol Oncol. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Despite the increase in the number of prognostic models currently available for evaluating patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), their current application and utilization in clinical practice in the era of targeted agents is unclear. A critical reappraisal of recently developed prognostic models is presented in this review. The underlying CLL's genetic instability and changes in the host's health and comorbidities can all contribute to the acquisition of additional risk factors for adverse outcomes during the course of the disease. Therefore, available risk models solely based on pretreatment variables only partially predict patients' clinical outcome. A dynamic prognostic model that takes into account changes in the risk profile over time could indeed be useful in routine clinical practice. The next generation of risk assessment models should incorporate post-treatment and response biomarkers such as minimal residual disease. Finally, recent advances in the field of machine learning present novel opportunities to generate models capable of providing an individualized estimation of clinical outcomes in CLL. However, in the era of improved prognostic models, it is important to remember that these indices should supplement but not replace clinical expertise and medical decision-making.

Keywords: CLL; dynamic prognostic models; machine learning; post-treatment biomarkers; prognostic models; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Rai KR, Sawitsky A, Cronkite EP, Chanana AD, Levy RN, Pasternack BS. Clinical staging of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1975;46:219-234.
    1. Binet JL, Auquier A, Dighiero G, et al. A new prognostic classification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia derived from a multivariate survival analysis. Cancer. 1981;48:198-206.
    1. Molica S. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia prognostic models in real life: still a long way off. Expert Rev Hematol. 2021;14(2):137-141.
    1. Kreuzberger N, Damen JA, Trivella M, et al. Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7:CD012022.
    1. Burger JA, Longo DL. Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(5):460-473.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources