Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 1;16(10):e0258102.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258102. eCollection 2021.

The relative effects of self-reported noise and odour annoyance on psychological distress: Different effects across sociodemographic groups?

Eline Berkers  1   2 , Ioana Pop  1 , Mariëlle Cloïn  2 , Antje Eugster  2   3 , Hans van Oers  2   4
Affiliations

The relative effects of self-reported noise and odour annoyance on psychological distress: Different effects across sociodemographic groups?

Eline Berkers et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In earlier research, both higher levels of noise and odour annoyance have been associated with decreased mental health. Presumably, these perceptions can trigger feelings of threat and stress reactions and in turn evoke psychological distress. There are two important lacunas in the research on this topic: most studies only consider either noise or odour annoyance and not their relative effect on psychological distress and there is scarce evidence about whether different sociodemographic groups experience more psychological distress due to noise and odour annoyance. Starting from the diversity in the available coping resources and in their daily life patterns, we distinguish gender, age and educational level as relevant sociodemographic variables. Using data from the Health Monitor (n = 25236) in Noord-Brabant, we found using Ordinary Least Squares Regression that individuals that reported higher levels of noise and odour annoyance reported higher levels of psychological distress. Furthermore, the effect of noise annoyance was relatively stronger compared to that of odour annoyance. Regarding the interaction effects, we found that younger adults' psychological distress was more strongly affected by noise annoyance compared to older adults, but not by odour annoyance. The psychological distress of individuals with no or primary education was more strongly affected by both noise and odour annoyance compared those with tertiary education, but not when compared to those who completed lower or higher secondary education. Contrary to our expectations, we did not find different effects between men and women. Though the evidence for the interactions was mixed, classic health inequalities along age and education lines are reinforced when considering the relationship between noise and odour annoyance and psychological distress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Interaction plot for predicted psychological distress among different age groups by level of noise annoyance.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Interaction plot for predicted psychological distress among different educational levels by level of noise annoyance.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Interaction plot for predicted psychological distress among different educational levels by level of odour annoyance by agriculture.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Interaction plot for predicted psychological distress among different educational levels by level of noise annoyance by other sources.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Gruebner O, Rapp MA, Adli M, Kluge U, Galea S, Heinz A. Cities and Mental Health. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114(8):121–7. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0121 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Honold J, Beyer R, Lakes T, van der Meer E. Multiple environmental burdens and neighborhood-related health of city residents. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2012;32(4):305–17. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.002. - DOI
    1. Rautio N, Filatova S, Lehtiniemi H, Miettunen J. Living environment and its relationship to depressive mood: A systematic review. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2018;64(1):92–103. doi: 10.1177/0020764017744582 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Neighborhood Disorder, Subjective Alienation, and Distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2009;50(1):49–64. doi: 10.1177/002214650905000104 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schafer MH, Upenieks L. Environmental disorder and functional decline among older adults: A layered context approach. Social Science & Medicine. 2015;124:152–61. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.037 - DOI - PubMed