Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;31(5):343-361.
doi: 10.1002/cbm.2215. Epub 2021 Oct 1.

Benefits and risks of conjugal visits in prison: A systematic literature review

Affiliations

Benefits and risks of conjugal visits in prison: A systematic literature review

Alexandra Vladu et al. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Imprisonment impacts on lives beyond the prisoner's. In particular, family and intimate relationships are affected. Only some countries permit private conjugal visits in prison between a prisoner and community living partner.

Aims: Our aim was to find evidence from published international literature on the safety, benefits or harms of such visits.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using broad search terms, including words like 'private' and 'family', to maximise search sensitivity but strict criteria for inclusion - of visits unobserved by prison staff and away from other prisoners. All included papers were quality assessed. Two of us independently extracted data from included papers, according to a prepared checklist. Meta-analysis was considered.

Results: Seventeen papers were identified from 12 independent studies, all but three of them from North America. The only study of health benefits found a positive association with maintaining sexual relationships. The three before-and-after study of partnership qualities suggested benefit, but conjugal visiting was within a wider family-support programme. Studies with in-prison behaviour as a possible outcome suggest small, if any, association, although one US-wide study found significantly fewer in-prison sexual assaults in states allowing conjugal visiting than those not. Other studies were of prisoner, staff or partner attitudes. There is little evidence of adverse effects, although two qualitative studies raise concerns about the visiting partner's sense of institutionalisation or coercion.

Conclusions: The balance of evidence about conjugal visiting is positive, but there is little of it. As stable family relationships have, elsewhere, been associated with desistance from crime, the contribution of conjugal visiting to these should be better researched.

Keywords: conjugal visit; consensual sex in prisons; imprisonment; prisoners; private visiting.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES
    1. Bales, W. D., & Mears, D. P. (2008). Inmate social ties and the transition to society: Does visitation reduce recidivism? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(3), 287-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427808317574
    1. Bennett, L. A. (1989). Correctional administrators’ attitudes toward private family visiting. The Prison Journal, 69(1), 110-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/003288558906900114
    1. Burstein, J. Q. (1977). Conjugal visits in prison: Psychological and social consequences. Lexington Books.
    1. Carcedo, R. J., Perlman, D., López, F., Orgaz, M. B., & Fernández-Rouco, N. (2015). The relationship between sexual satisfaction and psychological health of prison inmates: The moderating effects of sexual abstinence and gender. The Prison Journal, 95(1), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885514563271
    1. Carlson, B. E., & Cervera, N. (1991). Inmates and their families: Conjugal visits, family contact, and family functioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18(3), 318-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854891018003005
Court Cases
    1. [Lyons v. Gilligan, 382 F. Supp. 198 (N.D. Ohio1974)]
    1. Varnas v. Lithuania, [2013] (no. 42615/06)

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources