A comparative study of peri-operative outcomes for 100 consecutive post-chemotherapy and primary robot-assisted and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissections
- PMID: 34599350
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03832-0
A comparative study of peri-operative outcomes for 100 consecutive post-chemotherapy and primary robot-assisted and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissections
Abstract
Purpose: To describe and compare differences in peri-operative outcomes of robot-assisted (RA-RPLND) and open (O-RPLND) retroperitoneal lymph node dissection performed by a single surgeon where chemotherapy is the standard initial treatment for Stage 2 or greater non-seminomatous germ cell tumour.
Methods: Review of a prospective database of all RA-RPLNDs (28 patients) and O-RPLNDs (72 patients) performed by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2020. Peri-operative outcomes were compared for patients having RA-RPLND to all O-RPLNDs and a matched cohort of patients having O-RPLND (20 patients). Further comparison was performed between all patients in the RA-RPLND group (21 patients) and matched O-RPLND group (18 patients) who had previous chemotherapy. RA-RPLND was performed for patients suitable for a unilateral template dissection. O-RPLND was performed prior to the introduction of RA-RPLND and for patients not suitable for RA-RPLND after its introduction.
Results: RA-RPLND showed improved peri-operative outcomes compared to the matched cohort of O-RPLND-median blood loss (50 versus 400 ml, p < 0.00001), operative duration (150 versus 195 min, p = 0.023) length-of-stay (1 versus 5 days, p < 0.00001) and anejaculation (0 versus 4, p = 0.0249). There was no statistical difference in complication rates. RA-RPLND had lower median lymph node yields although not significant (9 versus 13, p = 0.070). These improved peri-operative outcomes were also seen in the post-chemotherapy RA-RPLND versus O-RPLND analysis. There were no tumour recurrences seen in either group with median follow-up of 36 months and 60 months, respectively.
Conclusions: Post-chemotherapy RA-RPLND may have decreased blood loss, operative duration, hospital length-of-stay and anejaculation rates in selected cases and should, therefore, be considered in selected patients. Differences in oncological outcomes require longer term follow-up.
Keywords: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection; Robotic surgery; Testicular cancer.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Comment in
-
Re: Lloyd P, Hong A, Furrer MA, et al. A comparative study of perioperative outcomes for 100 consecutive post-chemotherapy and primary robot assisted and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissections. World J Urol. 2021; DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03832-0.World J Urol. 2022 May;40(5):1243-1244. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03914-z. Epub 2022 Jan 22. World J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35064295 No abstract available.
References
-
- Motzer RJ, Agarwal N, Beard C, Bolger GB, Boston B, Carducci MA et al (2009) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: testicular cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7(6):672–693 - DOI
-
- Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F, Bokemeyer C, Cohn-Cedermark G, Fizazi K et al (2015) Guidelines on testicular cancer: 2015 update. Eur Urol 68(6):1054–1068 - DOI
-
- Chalfin HJ, Ludwig W, Pierorazio PM, Allaf ME (2016) Robotic primary RPLND for stage I testicular cancer: a review of indications and outcomes. Curr Urol Rep 17(5):41 - DOI
-
- Williams SB, McDermott DW, Winston D, Bahnson E, Berry AM, Steele GS et al (2010) Morbidity of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: contemporary perioperative data. BJU Int 105(7):918–921 - DOI
-
- Rukstalis DB, Chodak GW (1992) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a patient with stage 1 testicular carcinoma. J Urol 148(6):1907–1909 (discussion 9-10) - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
