Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 3;29(11):3140-3152.
doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.09.026. Epub 2021 Oct 1.

Genome editing in large animal models

Affiliations
Review

Genome editing in large animal models

Lucy H Maynard et al. Mol Ther. .

Abstract

Although genome editing technologies have the potential to revolutionize the way we treat human diseases, barriers to successful clinical implementation remain. Increasingly, preclinical large animal models are being used to overcome these barriers. In particular, the immunogenicity and long-term safety of novel gene editing therapeutics must be evaluated rigorously. However, short-lived small animal models, such as mice and rats, cannot address secondary pathologies that may arise years after a gene editing treatment. Likewise, immunodeficient mouse models by definition lack the ability to quantify the host immune response to a novel transgene or gene-edited locus. Large animal models, including dogs, pigs, and non-human primates (NHPs), bear greater resemblance to human anatomy, immunology, and lifespan and can be studied over longer timescales with clinical dosing regimens that are more relevant to humans. These models allow for larger scale and repeated blood and tissue sampling, enabling greater depth of study and focus on rare cellular subsets. Here, we review current progress in the development and evaluation of novel genome editing therapies in large animal models, focusing on applications in human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) infection, cancer, and genetic diseases including hemoglobinopathies, Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), hypercholesterolemia, and inherited retinal diseases.

Keywords: Base editor; CRISPR; Lipid nanoparticle; ZFN; dog; ex vivo gene therapy; genome editing; in vivo gene therapy; large animal models; meganuclease; nanoparticle; non-human primate; nuclease; pig; preclinical models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests H.P.K. has received support as the inaugural recipient of the José Carreras/E. Donnall Thomas Endowed Chair for Cancer Research and the Stephanus Family Endowed Chair for Cell and Gene Therapy, and is or was a consultant to and has or had ownership interests with Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Homology Medicines, VOR Biopharma and Ensoma Inc. H.P.K. has also been a consultant to CSL Behring and Magenta Therapeutics. Other authors have no competing interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract

References

    1. Seok J., Warren H.S., Cuenca A.G., Mindrinos M.N., Baker H.V., Xu W., Richards D.R., McDonald-Smith G.P., Gao H., Hennessy L., Inflammation and Host Response to Injury, Large Scale Collaborative Research Program Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:3507–3512. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parekh C., Crooks G.M. Critical differences in hematopoiesis and lymphoid development between humans and mice. J. Clin. Immunol. 2013;33:711–715. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Voskoglou-Nomikos T., Pater J.L., Seymour L. Clinical predictive value of the in vitro cell line, human xenograft, and mouse allograft preclinical cancer models. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003;9:4227–4239. - PubMed
    1. Begley C.G., Ellis L.M. Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature. 2012;483:531–533. - PubMed
    1. Cavanaugh S.E., Pippin J.J., Barnard N.D. Animal models of Alzheimer disease: historical pitfalls and a path forward. ALTEX. 2014;31:279–302. - PubMed

Publication types