Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb;57(1):73-112.
doi: 10.1080/10409238.2021.1979457. Epub 2021 Oct 2.

Reprogramming of the epigenome in neurodevelopmental disorders

Affiliations
Review

Reprogramming of the epigenome in neurodevelopmental disorders

Khadija D Wilson et al. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

The etiology of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) remains a challenge for researchers. Human brain development is tightly regulated and sensitive to cellular alterations caused by endogenous or exogenous factors. Intriguingly, the surge of clinical sequencing studies has revealed that many of these disorders are monogenic and monoallelic. Notably, chromatin regulation has emerged as highly dysregulated in NDDs, with many syndromes demonstrating phenotypic overlap, such as intellectual disabilities, with one another. Here we discuss epigenetic writers, erasers, readers, remodelers, and even histones mutated in NDD patients, predicted to affect gene regulation. Moreover, this review focuses on disorders associated with mutations in enzymes involved in histone acetylation and methylation, and it highlights syndromes involving chromatin remodeling complexes. Finally, we explore recently discovered histone germline mutations and their pathogenic outcome on neurological function. Epigenetic regulators are mutated at every level of chromatin organization. Throughout this review, we discuss mechanistic investigations, as well as various animal and iPSC models of these disorders and their usefulness in determining pathomechanism and potential therapeutics. Understanding the mechanism of these mutations will illuminate common pathways between disorders. Ultimately, classifying these disorders based on their effects on the epigenome will not only aid in prognosis in patients but will aid in understanding the role of epigenetic machinery throughout neurodevelopment.

Keywords: Chromatin; de novo mutations; epigenetics; histone; intellectual disability; monogenic disorders; neurodevelopmental disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 1:
Chromatin-modifying enzymes and the complexes they belong. Proteins mutated in NDDs are shown in color.
FIGURE 2:
FIGURE 2:
Histone post-translational modifications are classified as activating or repressing depending on the modification site and the degree of modifications. Histone acetylation is primarily activating whereas methylation can play both roles. The HATs and KMTs which are mutated in NDD, as well as their targets, are shown above.
FIGURE 3:
FIGURE 3:
Spatial expression of epigenetic factors dysregulated in NDD. (left) Graphical representation of brain regions in which most genes are highly expressed and their respective functions. (right) Expression in these three regions according to Consensus normalized expression (NX) levels on Protein atlas. This dataset was created by combining two transcriptomic datasets (GTEx and FANTOM5).

References

    1. Ajiro Kozo, Borun Thaddeus W., and Cohen Leonard H.. 1981. “Phosphorylation States of Different Histone 1 Subtypes and Their Relationship to Chromatin Functions during the HeLa S-3 Cell Cycle.” Biochemistry 20 (6): 1445–54. 10.1021/bi00509a007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akizu Naiara, and Martínez-Balbás Marian A.. 2016. “EZH2 Orchestrates Apicobasal Polarity and Neuroepithelial Cell Renewal.” Neurogenesis 3 (1). 10.1080/23262133.2016.1250034. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alarcón Juan M, Malleret Gaël, Touzani Khalid, Vronskaya Svetlana, Ishii Shunsuke, Kandel Eric R, and Barco Angel. 2004. “Chromatin Acetylation, Memory, and LTP Are Impaired in CBP+/− Mice: A Model for the Cognitive Deficit in Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome and Its Amelioration.” Neuron 42 (6): 947–59. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.05.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alari Valentina, Russo Silvia, Terragni Benedetta, Ajmone Paola Francesca, Sironi Alessandra, Catusi Ilaria, Calzari Luciano, et al. 2018. “IPSC-Derived Neurons of CREBBP- and EP300-Mutated Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome Patients Show Morphological Alterations and Hypoexcitability.” Stem Cell Research 30 (Stem Cells Transl. Med. 6 2017): 130–40. 10.1016/j.scr.2018.05.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albert Mareike, Kalebic Nereo, Florio Marta, Lakshmanaperumal Naharajan, Haffner Christiane, Brandl Holger, Henry Ian, and Huttner Wieland B.. 2017. “Epigenome Profiling and Editing of Neocortical Progenitor Cells during Development.” The EMBO Journal 36 (17): 2642–58. 10.15252/embj.201796764. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources