Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 3;29(1):145.
doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00953-8.

Deep-learning model for screening sepsis using electrocardiography

Affiliations

Deep-learning model for screening sepsis using electrocardiography

Joon-Myoung Kwon et al. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction and a major healthcare burden worldwide. Although sepsis is a medical emergency that requires immediate management, screening for the occurrence of sepsis is difficult. Herein, we propose a deep learning-based model (DLM) for screening sepsis using electrocardiography (ECG).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 46,017 patients who were admitted to two hospitals. A total of 1,548 and 639 patients had sepsis and septic shock, respectively. The DLM was developed using 73,727 ECGs from 18,142 patients, and internal validation was conducted using 7774 ECGs from 7,774 patients. Furthermore, we conducted an external validation with 20,101 ECGs from 20,101 patients from another hospital to verify the applicability of the DLM across centers.

Results: During the internal and external validations, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the DLM using 12-lead ECG was 0.901 (95% confidence interval, 0.882-0.920) and 0.863 (0.846-0.879), respectively, for screening sepsis and 0.906 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.877-0.936) and 0.899 (95% CI, 0.872-0.925), respectively, for detecting septic shock. The AUC of the DLM for detecting sepsis using 6-lead and single-lead ECGs was 0.845-0.882. A sensitivity map revealed that the QRS complex and T waves were associated with sepsis. Subgroup analysis was conducted using ECGs from 4,609 patients who were admitted with an infectious disease, and the AUC of the DLM for predicting in-hospital mortality was 0.817 (0.793-0.840). There was a significant difference in the prediction score of DLM using ECG according to the presence of infection in the validation dataset (0.277 vs. 0.574, p < 0.001), including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (0.260 vs. 0.725, p = 0.018).

Conclusions: The DLM delivered reasonable performance for sepsis screening using 12-, 6-, and single-lead ECGs. The results suggest that sepsis can be screened using not only conventional ECG devices but also diverse life-type ECG machines employing the DLM, thereby preventing irreversible disease progression and mortality.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Electrocardiography; Infections; Sepsis; Shock, Septic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

YRL, DYK, KHK, and SYL declare that they have no competing interests. JK, YYJ, MSJ, YJL, YHC, and JHS are researchers of Medical AI Co., a medical artificial intelligence company. JK and JHB are the researchers of Body Friend Co. There are no products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to the target journal.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Architecture of DLM to screen sepsis using ECG. conv convolutional neural network layer; DLM deep-learning model; ECG electrocardiography; FC fully connected layer
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Performance of DLM for screening sepsis and septic shock using electrocardiography. AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; ECG electrocardiography; NPV negative predictive value; PPV positive predictive value; SEN sensitivity; SPE specificity
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sensitivity map of septic shock patients
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Performance of DLM for predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with infectious disease. AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; ECG electrocardiography; MEWS Modified Early Warning Score; NEWS National Early Warning Score; NPV negative predictive value; PPV positive predictive value; SEN sensitivity; SOFA sequential organ failure assessment; SPE specificity
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Change of DLM’s prediction score according to infection. SARS-CoV-2 Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

References

    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:486–552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395:200–211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudd KE, Kissoon N, Limmathurotsakul D, Bory S, Mutahunga B, Seymour CW, et al. The global burden of sepsis: barriers and potential solutions. Crit Care. 2018;22:232. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2157-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jain S, Workman V, Ganeshan R, Obasare ER, Burr A, DeBiasi RM, et al. Enhanced electrocardiographic monitoring of patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019. Hear Rhythm. 2020;17:1417–1422. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.04.047. - DOI - PMC - PubMed