Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct;11(10):429.
doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02962-x. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

Management of microbial enzymes for biofuels and biogas production by using metagenomic and genome editing approaches

Affiliations
Review

Management of microbial enzymes for biofuels and biogas production by using metagenomic and genome editing approaches

J Rajesh Banu et al. 3 Biotech. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Non-renewable fossil fuels such as bitumen, coal, natural gas, oil shale, and petroleum are depleting over the world owing to unrestricted consumption. Biofuels such as biodiesel, biobutanol, bioethanol, and biogas are considered an eco-friendly and cost-effective alternatives of fossil fuels. For energy sustainability, the production of advanced biofuels is required. The advancement of genetic and metabolic engineering in microbial cells played a significant contribution to biofuels overproduction. Essential approaches such as next-generation sequencing technologies and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing of microbial cells are required for the mass manufacture of biofuels globally. Advanced "omics" approaches are used to construct effective microorganisms for biofuels manufacturing. A new investigation is required to augment the production of lignocellulosic-based biofuels with minimal use of energy. Advanced areas of metabolic engineering are introduced in the manufacture of biofuels by the use of engineered microbial strains. Genetically modified microorganisms are used for the production of biofuels in large quantities at a low-cost.

Keywords: Biofuels; Biogas; Genetic engineering; Metabolic engineering; Microbiome; Omics approaches.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestNone.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic representation of culture dependent and independent methods for identifying microbial enzymes for biofuel production from environment. Hypervariable V1–V9 regions of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene are used to identify bacterial communities; whereas, 18S rRNA genes are used to identify fungal communities by next generation sequencing. Bacterial artificial chromosomes (BAC), cosmid, and fosmid are used as a vector and E. coli as a host for cloning of DNA fragment to construct metagenomic library. Sanger sequence-based screening approaches are used to identify microbial enzymes from metagenomic library of environmental samples
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic representation of biogas and biofuels production from the lignocellulosic biomass, oil crops, sugarcane/food waste through pre-treatment, and anaerobic digestion. Sugar, fat, and proteins are converted into organic acids and alcohols by acidogenesis; organic acids and alcohols are converted into hydrogen (H2), carbon dioxide (CO2), and acetic acid (CH3COOH) by acetogenic bacteria. Methanogenic bacteria are involved in the synthesis of biogas from CH3COOH, CO2, and H2

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abendroth C, Vilanova C, Günther T, Luschnig O, Porcar M. Eubacteria and archaea communities in seven mesophile anaerobic digester plants in Germany. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:87. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0271-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adegboye MF, Ojuederie OB, Talia PM, Babalola OO. Bioprospecting of microbial strains for biofuel production: metabolic engineering, applications, and challenges. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14:5. doi: 10.1186/s13068-020-01853-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aikawa S, Baramee S, Sermsathanaswadi J, et al. Characterization and high-quality draft genome sequence of Herbivorax saccincola A7, an anaerobic, alkaliphilic, thermophilic, cellulolytic, and xylanolytic bacterium. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2018;41:261–269. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2018.01.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akinosho H, Yee K, Close D, Ragauskas A. The emergence of Clostridium thermocellum as a high utility candidate for consolidated bioprocessing applications. Front Chem. 2014;2:66. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2014.00066. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angermayr SA, Hellingwerf KJ, Lindblad P, de Mattos MJ. Energy biotechnology with cyanobacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20:257–263. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.011. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources