Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 21:26:100456.
doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100456. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Effects of patient-driven iCBT for anxiety in routine primary care and the relation between increased experience of empowerment and outcome: A randomized controlled trial

Linnea Nissling  1   2   3 , Martin Kraepelien  4 , Viktor Kaldo  4   5 , Dominique Hange  2   3 , Anna Larsson  1   2 , Marie Persson  2   3 , Sandra Weineland  1   2   3
Affiliations

Effects of patient-driven iCBT for anxiety in routine primary care and the relation between increased experience of empowerment and outcome: A randomized controlled trial

Linnea Nissling et al. Internet Interv. .

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization has declared that primary care should be organized to empower individuals, families, and communities to optimize health. Internet cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) tailored by psychologists' initial assessments to meet patients' specific needs have shown promising effects. However, few studies have evaluated patient involvement in decisions during iCBT.

Aim: This study aimed to explore the effect of patient-driven iCBT compared to standard iCBT on perceived control over treatment, adherence, and level of anxiety symptoms. A secondary aim was to assess the relationship between changes in empowerment and changes in anxiety symptoms.

Method: Participants were patients recruited form primary care and assessed as meeting the criterion for an anxiety disorder. Participants were randomized to patient-driven iCBT (n = 27) or standard iCBT (n = 28). Patient-driven iCBT was adapted to participants' preferences regarding for example focus of treatment program and order of modules. Participants randomized to the control condition received the standard iCBT program for anxiety disorders at the participating unit. The outcome measures were patients' perceived control over treatment, adherence to treatment, symptoms of anxiety, depression and general disability as well as the experience of empowerment.

Results: Participants in patient-driven iCBT had statistically higher perceived control over treatment (t(43) = 2.13, p = .04). Symptoms were significantly reduced in both arms with regards to anxiety, depression, and general disability. A significant time per condition interaction effect for anxiety symptoms was observed (df = 45.0; F = 3.055; p = .038), where the patient-driven condition had a significantly larger reduction in anxiety. For both groups a significant correlation of r = -0.47 was found between changes in empowerment and changes in anxiety.

Conclusion: Results indicate that iCBT that is patient-driven, may have a greater effect on anxiety, than standard iCBT. The effect on perceived control over treatment might also be larger in patient-driven treatments than in standard iCBT. Internet-based therapies inherently promote as active agents of their own care and might be well suited for promoting perceived control and empowerment. Findings need to be replicated given the small sample size and the explorative nature of the study.

Clinical trials registration: NCT04688567.

Keywords: Acceptance and commitment therapy; Anxiety disorders; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Empowerment; Internet-based intervention; Patient involvement; Person-centered care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow diagram *The exact number of participants varied in the different analyses.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Adamson S.J., Bland J.M., Hay E., Johnson R.E., Johns G., Kitchener H., Torgerson D.J. Patients' preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;337 doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1864. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychological Association, Presidential TaskForce on Evidence-Based Practice Evidence-based practice in psychology. Am. Psychol. 2006;61(4):271–285. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersson G. Internet interventions: past, present and future. Internet Interv. 2018;12:181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.03.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersson G., Estling F., Jakobsson E., Cuijpers P., Carlbring P. Can the patient decide which modules to endorse? An open trial of tailored internet treatment of anxiety disorders. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 2011;40(1):57–64. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2010.529457. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Britten N., Ekman I., Naldemirci Ö., Javinger M., Hedman H., Wolf A. Learning from Gothenburg model of person centred healthcare. BMJ. 2020;370 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2738. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data