Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 22;2021(1):5.
doi: 10.5339/qmj.2021.5. eCollection 2021.

Fecal microbiota transplants: A review of emerging clinical data on applications, efficacy, and risks (2015-2020)

Affiliations

Fecal microbiota transplants: A review of emerging clinical data on applications, efficacy, and risks (2015-2020)

Dana Al-Ali et al. Qatar Med J. .

Abstract

As the importance of the gut microbiota in health and disease is a subject of growing interest, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was suggested as an attractive therapeutic strategy to restore homeostasis of the gut microbiota, thereby treating diseases that were associated with alteration of the gut microbiota. FMT involves the administration of fresh, frozen, or dried fecal microorganisms from the gut of a healthy donor into the intestinal tract of a patient. This rediscovery of the potential benefits of an ancient practice was accompanied by a rapid progression of our understanding of the roles and mechanisms of gut microbes in the pathogenesis of disease. With a growing number of diseases being associated with dysbiosis or the alteration of gut microbiota, FMT was suggested as an attractive therapeutic strategy to "reset the gut" and initiate clinical resolutions or remissions. The number of FMT clinical trials is increasing worldwide, but no trials are registered in the Gulf region; this suggested the need for raising awareness of the latest studies on FMT. This review presented the emergent preclinical and clinical data to give an overview of the potential clinical applications, the benefits, and inconveniences that were worth considering for eventual future testing of fecal transplants in Qatar and the Middle East. This study highlighted the diversity of methods tested and commented on the variables that can affect the assessment of the effectiveness of FMT in specific diseases. The risks associated with FMT and the threat of antimicrobial resistance for this therapeutic approach were reviewed. From gastrointestinal diseases to neurodevelopmental disorders, understanding the roles of the gut microbiota in health and disease should be at the heart of developing novel, standardized, yet personalized, methods for this ancient therapeutic approach.

Keywords: Clostridium difficile; Fecal transplant; Qatar; antibiotic resistance; clinical trial; microbiota.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Growing scientific interest toward fecal transplants over the past 15 years. A search using the MeSH term “fecal transplant” was done on PubMed and filtered for the last 15 years.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Key milestones in the history of fecal transplants.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Worldwide distribution of fecal transplants clinical trials as of May 19, 2020. A total of 215 trials registered in database clinicaltrials.gov with search term “fecal transplant.” Trials that were labeled as withdrawn, terminated, or suspended were excluded.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Worldfecal transplants clinical trials (number per disease category). Abbreviations: IBD = inflammatory bowel disease; AMR = antibiotic resistance; GVDH = graft versus host disease; C. diff = Clostridium difficile infection; Neuro/psych = neurological diseases and neuropsychiatric disorders; IBS = irritable bowel syndrome. Data were obtained from clinicaltrials.gov as per method detailed in section 2.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Proportions of clinical trials for GI diseases and disorders. Abbreviations: UC = ulcerative colitis; IBD = inflammatory bowel disease (nonspecified); CD = Crohn's disease; Other GI = other gastrointestinal disorders; Liver = liver diseases; IBS = irritable bowel syndrome. Data were obtained from clinicaltrials.gov as per method detailed in section 2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gareau MG. Cognitive Function and the Microbiome. Int Rev Neurobiol [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Mar 13];131:227–46. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0074774216301349. - PubMed
    1. Mayer EA, Knight R, Mazmanian SK, Cryan JF, Tillisch K. Gut microbes and the brain: paradigm shift in neuroscience. J Neurosci [Internet]. 2014 Nov 12 [cited 2017 Mar 13];34(46):15490–6. Available from: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3299-14.2014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jie Z, Xia H, Zhong S-L, Feng Q, Li S, Liang S, et al. The gut microbiome in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nat Commun [Internet]. 2017 Dec 10 [cited 2019 Nov 26];8(1):845. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29018189. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsai Y-L, Lin T-L, Chang C-J, Wu T-R, Lai W-F, Lu C-C, et al. Probiotics, prebiotics and amelioration of diseases. J Biomed Sci. 2019 Dec;26(1):3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kho ZY, Lal SK. The Human Gut Microbiome–A Potential Controller of Wellness and Disease. Front Microbiol [Internet]. 2018 Aug 14 [cited 2019 Nov 27];9:1835. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30154767. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources