Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 17:11:737827.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.737827. eCollection 2021.

Comparison of the Relative Diagnostic Performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for the Detection of Bone Metastasis in Patients With Different Cancers

Affiliations

Comparison of the Relative Diagnostic Performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for the Detection of Bone Metastasis in Patients With Different Cancers

Junhao Wu et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: The present retrospective analysis sought to compare the relative diagnostic efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 to that of [18F]FDG PET/CT as a means of detecting bone metastases in patients with a range of cancer types.

Materials: In total, 30 patients with bone metastases associated with different underlying malignancies were retrospectively enrolled. All patients had undergone [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT, and the McNemar test was used to compare the relative diagnostic performance of these two imaging modalities. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was used to quantify radiotracer uptake by metastatic lesions, with the relative uptake associated with these two imaging strategies being compared via the Mann-Whitney U test. The cohort was further respectively divided into two (osteolytic and osteoblastic bone metastases) and three clinical subgroups (lung cancer, thyroid cancer, and liver cancer).

Results: [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT was found to be significantly more sensitive as a means of diagnosing bone metastases relative to [18F]FDG PET/CT ([109/109] 100% vs [89/109] 81.7%; P< 0.01), consistent with the significantly increased uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 by these metastatic lesions relative to that of [18F]FDG (n=109, median SUVmax, 9.1 vs. 4.5; P< 0.01). [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 accumulation was significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG in both osteolytic (n=66, median SUVmax, 10.6 vs 6.1; P < 0.01), and osteoblastic metastases (n=43, median SUVmax, 7.7 vs 3.7; P < 0.01). [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 uptakes were significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG in bone metastases from lung cancer (n = 62, median SUVmax, 10.7 vs 5.2; P < 0.01), thyroid cancer (n = 18, median SUVmax, 5.65 vs 2.1; P < 0.01) and liver cancer (n = 12, median SUVmax, 5.65 vs 3.05; P < 0.01). However, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 detected 10 false-positive lesions, while only 5 false-positive were visualized by [18F]FDG PET/CT.

Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT exhibits excellent diagnostic performance as a means of detecting bone metastases, and is superior to [18F]FDG PET/CT in this diagnostic context. Furthermore, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 tracer uptake levels are higher than those of [18F]FDG for most bone metastases. However, owing to the potential for false-positive bone lesions, it is critical that physicians interpret all CT findings with caution to ensure diagnostic accuracy.

Keywords: PET/CT; [18F]FDG; [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04; bone metastases; cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The SUVmax of FAPI and FDG in 77 bone metastatic lesions. The tracer accumulation of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in bone metastases is significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG (n=109, median SUVmax, 9.1 vs 4.5; P< 0.01, respectively).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The SUVmax of FAPI and FDG in osteolytic and osteoblastic lesions. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 accumulation was significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG in both osteolytic (n=66, median SUVmax, 10.6 vs 6.1; P < 0.01), and osteoblastic metastases (n=43, median SUVmax, 7.7 vs 3.7; P < 0.01).
Figure 3
Figure 3
A 46-year-old woman with a newly diagnosed lung cancer underwent [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT (A, B). The MIP images (A, B) of the [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed multiple bone lesions. On the selected axial images, [18F]FDG PET/CT (A) only showed mild to moderate [18F]FDG activities on thoracic vertebrae (arrows) and right acetabulum (dashed arrows), whereas [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT (B) showed intense [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 uptakes in thoracic vertebrae (arrows) and right acetabulum (dashed arrows).
Figure 4
Figure 4
A 63-year-old man was received [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT (A, B) to evaluate the new diagnosed lung cancer. The MIP image (A, B) of [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated multiple bone lesions. On the selected axial images, [18F]FDG PET/CT (A) only showed slight [18F]FDG activities in the clivus (arrows) and lumbar vertebral (dashed arrows). On the contrary, intense FAPI uptakes in the clivus (arrows) and lumbar vertebral (dashed arrows) were obviously observed on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The SUVmax of FAPI and FDG in bone metastases from lung cancer, thyroid cancer and liver cancer. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 accumulation was significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG in bone metastases from lung cancer (n = 62, median SUVmax, 10.7 vs 5.2; P < 0.01), thyroid cancer (n = 18, median SUVmax, 5.65 vs 2.1; P < 0.01) and liver cancer (n = 12, median SUVmax, 5.65 vs 3.05; P < 0.01).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Characteristic findings of Schmorl Node (A) and degenerative osteophyte (B). The Schmorl Node in the patient with lung cancer (A) shows tracer uptake on the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT, while no uptake on the [18F]FDG PET/CT. The degenerative osteophyte in the patient with lung cancer (B) shows tracer accumulation on [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT.
Figure 7
Figure 7
A 76-year-old woman underwent [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT (A, B) to assess possible recurrence of thyroid cancer. The MIP image (A, B) of [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated multiple tracer activities bone and liver lesions. On the selected axial images, [18F]FDG PET/CT (A) showed limited [18F]FDG uptakes in the parietal bone (arrows) and clivus (dashed arrows), while [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT (B) showed intense [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 uptakes in the parietal bone (arrows) and clivus (dashed arrows). In addition, the expression of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 in liver metastasis was significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morita M, Higuchi T, Achmad A, Tokue A, Arisaka Y, Tsushima Y. Complementary Roles of Tumour Specific PET Tracer (1)(8)F-FAMT to (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT for the Assessment of Bone Metastasis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2013) 40(11):1672–81. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2487-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chin H, Kim J. Bone Metastasis: Concise Overview. Fed Pract: Health Care Prof VA DoD PHS (2015) 32(2):24–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kimura T. Multidisciplinary Approach for Bone Metastasis: A Review. Cancers (2018) 10(6). doi: 10.3390/cancers10060156 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roodman GD. Mechanisms of Bone Metastasis. New Engl J Med (2004) 350(16):1655–64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra030831 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ell B, Kang Y. SnapShot: Bone Metastasis. Cell (2012) 151(3):690.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.005 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources