Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 17:11:743542.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.743542. eCollection 2021.

MicroRNAs as Diagnostic Biomarkers in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations

MicroRNAs as Diagnostic Biomarkers in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Xiaohong Zheng et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remains a challenge. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are promising noninvasive markers for the identification of PCNSL. The present study aims to assess the diagnostic value of miRNAs for PCNSL patients as biomarkers.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library from inception to January 31, 2021. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), together with the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve, and the area under the SROC curve (AUC) value were used to estimate the overall diagnostic performance. We used Q statistic and I2 to test heterogeneity and used subgroup analyses to investigate the source of heterogeneity. The statistical analyses were independently performed by two investigators using Stata 14.0 and Revman 5.3.

Results: In total, 11 studies from 6 records were included in the current meta-analysis with 281 PCNSL patients and 367 controls. Our statistical analysis demonstrated that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.91 (95% CI 0.84-0.95), 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.91), 7.48 (95% CI 5.71-9.78), 0.11 (95% CI 0.06-0.19), 70 (95% CI 35-142), and 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.92), respectively. The studies had substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 54%, 95% CI 0-100). Two subgroup analyses were conducted based on the type of specimen and miRNAs profiled.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicated that miRNAs were suitable as noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers for PCNSL with high accuracy. In addition, both cerebrospinal fluid-based and blood-based miRNAs assays for PCNSL detection were considered reliable for clinical application. MicroRNA-21 assays also seemed to be more accurate in the diagnosis of PCNSL. Good quality studies with large samples should be conducted to verify our results.

Keywords: brain tumor; diagnosis; meta-analysis; microRNAs; primary central nervous system lymphoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plots of sensitivities (A) and specificities (B) for total miRNA levels of 11 studies in the diagnosis of PCNSL. PCNSL, primary central nervous system lymphoma.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plots of PLR (A) and NLR (B) for total miRNA levels of 11 studies in the diagnosis of PCNSL. PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; PCNSL, primary central nervous system lymphoma.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plots of DOR for total miRNA levels of 11 studies in the diagnosis of PCNSL. DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; PCNSL, primary central nervous system lymphoma.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Summary ROC curve with confidence around mean operating sensitivity and specificity point. ROC, receiver operator characteristic.
Figure 6
Figure 6
QUADAS-2 risk of bias and applicability concerns graph showing review authors’ judgments about each domain as percentages of included studies. QUADAS-2, the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
Figure 7
Figure 7
QUADAS-2 summary of risk of bias and applicability concerns showing review authors’ judgments about each domain for each included study. QUADAS-2, the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Linear regression test of funnel plot asymmetry.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Batchelor TT. Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Curable Disease. Hematol Oncol (2019) 37 Suppl 1:15–8. doi: 10.1002/hon.2598 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schorb E, Finke J, Ferreri AJ, Ihorst G, Mikesch K, Kasenda B, et al. . High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Compared With Conventional Chemotherapy for Consolidation in Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma–a Randomized Phase III Trial (MATRix). BMC Cancer (2016) 16:282. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2311-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Fulop J, Liu M, Blanda R, Kromer C, et al. . CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro-oncology (2015) 17 Suppl 4:iv1–iv62. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov189 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abrey LE, Batchelor TT, Ferreri AJ, Gospodarowicz M, Pulczynski EJ, Zucca E, et al. . Report of an International Workshop to Standardize Baseline Evaluation and Response Criteria for Primary CNS Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol (2005) 23:5034–43. doi: 10.1200/jco.2005.13.524 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Korfel A, Schlegel U. Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary CNS Lymphoma. Nat Rev Neurol (2013) 9:317–27. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.83 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources