Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 24;9(9):23259671211028168.
doi: 10.1177/23259671211028168. eCollection 2021 Sep.

Prospective and Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Soccer Players

Luiz Gabriel Betoni Guglielmetti  1 , Victor Eduardo Roman Salas  1 , Pedro Baches Jorge  1 , Fabrício Roberto Severino  1 , Aires Duarte  1 , Victor Marques de Oliveira  1 , Ricardo de Paula Leite Cury  1
Affiliations

Prospective and Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Soccer Players

Luiz Gabriel Betoni Guglielmetti et al. Orthop J Sports Med. .

Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is usually performed with autologous bone-patellar tendon-bone (PT) or hamstring tendon (HT) graft. There has been only 1 randomized clinical trial examining ACL reconstruction with these grafts specifically in soccer players, and more studies comparing these graft types within a homogenous cohort such as soccer athletes may better highlight differences in outcomes.

Purpose: To compare the results of ACL reconstruction with PT versus HT autograft in soccer players and to evaluate objective and subjective outcomes.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: A total of 62 professional or semiprofessional soccer players (mean age, 25.1 years) with ACL injury were randomized to undergo reconstruction with PT or HT autograft by a single orthopaedic surgeon (n = 31 in each group). Outcome measures were recorded preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. The primary outcome was the modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and secondary outcomes were the objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, anterior drawer test, and Lysholm score. The following variables were also evaluated postoperatively: return to soccer, level at return, graft rerupture, postoperative complications, anterior knee pain, patellar tendinitis, difficulty sprinting, and loss of kicking power.

Results: The PT and HT groups were homogenous in terms of age, sex distribution, injured side, and time from injury to surgery, and there was no difference between them on any preoperative outcome score. At 2 years postoperatively, there were no differences between the groups on any outcome score; however, there were significantly fewer patients with anterior knee pain in the HT group compared with the PT group (7 [22.6%] vs 15 [48.4%], respectively; P = .03). Two patients from each group (2/31; 6.5%) sustained rerupture.

Conclusion: There were no differences between soccer players who underwent different types of ACL reconstruction with the exception of anterior knee pain, which was more frequent in players who underwent reconstruction with PT graft.Registration: NCT02642692 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Keywords: ACL; graft; reconstruction; sports.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT flow diagram. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; HT, hamstring tendon; PT, patellar tendon.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Allen MM, Pareek A, Krych AJ, et al.Are female soccer players at an increased risk of second anterior cruciate ligament injury compared with their athletic peers? Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(10):2492–2498. - PubMed
    1. Andernord D, Desai N, Bjornsson H, Ylander M, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K. Patient predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 16,930 patients with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(1):121–127. - PubMed
    1. Anderson AF, Irrgang JJ, Kocher MS, Mann BJ, Harrast JJ. The International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation form: normative data. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(1):128–135. - PubMed
    1. Carter TR, Edinger S. Isokinetic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: hamstring versus patellar tendon. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(2):169–172. - PubMed
    1. Chee MY, Chen Y, Pearce CJ, et al.Outcome of patellar tendon versus 4-strand hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(2):450–463. - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources