Promoting padawans: a survey examining the state of mentorship in neurosurgical training in the United Kingdom
- PMID: 34605722
- DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1982864
Promoting padawans: a survey examining the state of mentorship in neurosurgical training in the United Kingdom
Abstract
Background: Mentorship has long since been acknowledged as an integral part of Neurosurgical training. The authors sought to evaluate the state of mentorship in Neurosurgical training in the United Kingdom (UK).
Methods: A 28-point questionnaire was sent to all neurosurgical trainees in the UK and Ireland via the British Neurosurgical Trainee's Association (BNTA), comprising 180 trainees.
Results: There were 75 responses (180 trainees on the mailing list, 42% response rate). Despite all respondents reporting it to be at least somewhat important to have a mentor, 16% felt they had no mentors. The mean number of mentors was 2.91 with 72% of respondents having more than 1 mentor. In terms of the content of mentorship relationships, 63% were comfortable discussing career related topics with their mentor to a high or very high degree but only 29% felt comfortable discussing their general wellbeing. With regards to allocated educational supervisors, 43% thought this person to be a 'low' or 'very low' source of mentorship. The three most important traits of the ideal mentor as reported by respondents were: someone chosen by them (48%), working in the same hospital (44%) and having received formal mentorship training (36%).
Conclusions: The current perception of mentorship in Neurosurgery from the surveyed trainees is mixed. A healthy majority of trainees benefit from mentorship of some kind, whilst a significant minority feel underserved. The surveyed trainees feel mentorship is slanted more towards clinical and professional aspects of development than it is towards personal ones. Suggestions for future insight would be an evaluation of senior registrar and consultant sentiments towards mentorship, whilst exploration into more flexible models for establishing mentoring relationships may help to address the heavy importance of trainee choice which is voiced by this survey's results.
Keywords: Mentor; mentorship; neurosurgery; supervisor; training.
Similar articles
-
Effects of Mentorship on Graduating Vascular Surgery Trainees.Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;44:234-240. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.03.173. Epub 2017 May 11. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017. PMID: 28501657
-
Mentorship in surgical training: current status and a needs assessment for future mentoring programs in surgery.World J Surg. 2015 Feb;39(2):303-13; discussion 314. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2774-x. World J Surg. 2015. PMID: 25315087 Free PMC article.
-
Appraisal of mentorship in cardiothoracic surgery training.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;156(6):2216-2223. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.06.046. Epub 2018 Jul 18. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 30119904
-
Supervisor or mentor: is there a difference? Implications for paediatric practice.Arch Dis Child. 2015 Sep;100(9):873-8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306834. Epub 2015 Apr 21. Arch Dis Child. 2015. PMID: 25900841 Review.
-
Demystifying mentorship: Tips for successfully navigating the mentor-mentee journey.Am J Hum Biol. 2022 Feb;34 Suppl 1:e23690. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23690. Epub 2021 Oct 18. Am J Hum Biol. 2022. PMID: 34664346 Review.
Cited by
-
A scoping review of mentorship in Graduate Medical Education: a proposed conceptual framework.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 18;12:1616148. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1616148. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40901506 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources