Three-dimensional ultrasound volume and conventional ultrasound diameter changes are equally good markers of endoleak in follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair

Abstract

Introduction: The main disadvantages of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair are the risks of contrast-induced renal impairment and radiation-induced cancer. Three-dimensional ultrasound is a new technique for volume estimation of the aneurysm sac. Some studies have reported promising results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of three-dimensional ultrasound aneurysm sac-volume estimates, and to explore whether volume and/or diameter changes on ultrasound can be used as markers of endoleak.

Methods: A single-center diagnostic accuracy study was performed. A total of 92 patients planned for endovascular aneurysm repair were prospectively and consecutively enrolled (2013-2016). Aneurysm sac diameter and volume were measured using CTA, conventional ultrasound, and three-dimensional ultrasound preoperatively and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Three-dimensional ultrasound was performed with a commercially available electromechanical transducer. Patients with endoleak were observed 5 years after endovascular aneurysm repair.

Results: A total of 79 men and 13 women were included. Mean age was 74 years (57-92 years). Median follow-up was 24 months. Endoleak cases were observed for up to 55 months. Diameter measurements on conventional ultrasound correlated well with CT diameters (r = 0.9, P < .05, n = 347), and Bland-Altman analyses showed an upper limit of agreement of +0.5 cm and a lower limit of agreement of -0.8 cm. The mean difference was -0.13 cm ± 0.36 cm. Three-dimensional ultrasound volumes had a correlation with CTA diameters of r = 0.8 (P < .05, n = 347) and with three-dimensional CT volumes of r = 0.8 (P < .05, n = 155). Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed that the diameter and volume changes that led to reintervention were most accurate at 24-month follow-up, with area-under-the-curve percentage changes of 0.98 (two-dimensional ultrasound), 0.97 (three-dimensional ultrasound), and 0.97 (two-dimensional CT).

Discussion: Both diameter and volume changes can be used as markers for endoleak with excellent areas under the curve on receiver operating characteristic analyses. However, three-dimensional ultrasound volumes did not add any further diagnostic information. Conventional 2D diameter measurements were as accurate as volume changes as markers of endoleak.

Conclusions: Type II endoleaks can safely be followed up using a simple diameter measurement on conventional ultrasound.

Keywords: Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Computed tomography angiography; Endoleak; Endovascular aneurysm repair; Three-dimensional ultrasound; Ultrasound imaging; Volume measurement.