Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2022 Apr 1;28(4):233-239.
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001099. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

Development of a Simplified Patient-Centered Pelvic Floor Surgery Complication Scale

Jocelyn Fitzgerald  1 , Holly E Richter  2 , Vivian Sung  3 , Gena Dunivan  4 , Mihriye Mete  1 , Robert E Gutman  1
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Development of a Simplified Patient-Centered Pelvic Floor Surgery Complication Scale

Jocelyn Fitzgerald et al. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: There does not currently exist a complication scale to evaluate pelvic reconstructive surgery (PRS) that takes in account patient-centered outcomes. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare patient and surgeon responses to a simplified, patient-centered version of the previously described Pelvic Floor Complication Scale (PFCS).

Methods: This is a multicenter (4 female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery practices) cross-sectional study of patients and surgeons. Using focus groups and telephone surveys, the original PFCS questionnaire was simplified. One hundred and twenty-four patients were recruited 6-12 months after PRS. Fifty-seven surgeons were recruited via electronic questionnaires. Surgeons and patients were asked to rank the severity and bother of each complication on a scale of 0 to 5 (0, none; 1, mild; 3, moderate; 5, major).

Results: Patients rated bother higher than severity for 36 of 38 complications (all differences ≤0.5 points). For statistical analysis, the highest response to patient bother/severity was chosen to weigh in favor of the patient. Patient bother/severity scores were significantly different (±0.5 points) for 27 of 38 complications compared with surgeon responses. Surgeon scores were higher for 5 complications (0.5-1.9 point differences) related to major injury requiring repair and wound breakdown. Patient scores were higher for 22 complications with the highest differences related to dyspareunia, constipation, or new/persistent urinary incontinence.

Conclusions: This mixed methods investigation revealed key differences between how patients and surgeons value PRS complications. Surgeons scored major surgical injuries higher than patients, whereas patients rated issues that many surgeons consider quality-of-life outcomes higher due to potential long-term bother. These data will be used to create a simplified, patient-centered PFCS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Difference between Patient and Surgeon Mean Scores
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Correlation: Patient vs. Surgeon
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Composite Mean of Patient and Surgeon Scores
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–196. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2066–2076. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0912658 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(21):2143–2155. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070416 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fitzgerald J, Siddique M, Miranne JM, Saunders P, Gutman R. Development of a Patient-Centered Pelvic Floor Complication Scale. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. Published online March 14, 2019. doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000705 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types