Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 24:2021:8042910.
doi: 10.1155/2021/8042910. eCollection 2021.

Skeletal Divergence and Condylar Asymmetry in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD): A Retrospective Study

Affiliations

Skeletal Divergence and Condylar Asymmetry in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD): A Retrospective Study

Maria Francesca Sfondrini et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

Introduction: This study was aimed at evaluating the association between vertical skeletal patterns, condylar height symmetry, and temporomandibular disorders in adults.

Methods: The study sample consisted of 200 patients (ages 18-30 years old) retrospectively recruited: 100 with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and 100 without TMD (control), diagnosed by Diagnostic Criteria for the Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). For each subject, skeletal divergence was assessed on lateral cephalograms, and condylar height symmetry was evaluated by orthopantomography (Habets' method).

Results: Subjects with temporomandibular disorders showed a strong association with condylar asymmetry (p < 0.0001) and, for the skeletal pattern variables, hyperdivergence (p < 0.001). A correlation with the female sex was also found (p < 0.04), while there was no difference in terms of age in the 2 groups (p > 0.29).

Conclusions: Although it does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship, the present study suggests condylar asymmetry and hyperdivergent skeletal pattern are more likely to be associated with a higher risk of temporomandibular disorder joint diseases in adult patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
OPG analysis. Measurement of condylar height symmetry: the most lateral point of the condyle (X) and the ramus (Y) are individuated, and a line passing through these points (A) is drawn. Then, a line (B) passing through the most superior point of the condyle and perpendicular to A is traced. Condylar height (CH) is the distance in mm between X and the intersection of A and B (Z).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cephalometric analysis. Measurement of the angle between the plane passing through the anterior and posterior nasal spine (SnaSnp) and the plane passing through the gonion and gnathion mandibular points (GoGn).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Skeletal divergence: sample distribution.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Condylar symmetry: sample distribution.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Sex: sample distribution.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sebbar M., Abidine Z., Laslami N., Bentahar Z. Emerging trends in oral health sciences and dentistry. Periodontal health and orthodontics . IntechOpen; 2015.
    1. Ingervall B., Mohlin B., Thailander B. Prevalence of symptoms of functional disturbances of the masticatory system in Swedish men. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation . 1980;7(3):185–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1980.tb00435.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nilner M., Lassing S. A. Prevalence of functional disturbances and diseases of the stomatognathic system in 7-14 year olds. Swedish Dental Journal . 1981;5(5-6):173–187. - PubMed
    1. Manfredini D., Guarda-Nardini L., Winocur E., Piccotti F., Ahlberg J., Lobbezoo F. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of axis I epidemiologic findings. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. . 2011;112(4):453–462. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.04.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leresche L., Drangsholt M. Epidemiology of orofacial pain: prevalence, incidence, and risk factors. In: Sessle B. J., Lavigne G. J., Lund J. P., Dubner R., editors. Orofacial Pain. From Basic Science to Clinical Management . 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2008. pp. 13–18.