Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;314(9):823-838.
doi: 10.1007/s00403-021-02283-2. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

Intense Pulsed Light on skin rejuvenation: a systematic review

Affiliations

Intense Pulsed Light on skin rejuvenation: a systematic review

Abdias Fernando Simon Sales et al. Arch Dermatol Res. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Aged skin is characterized by appearance of wrinkles, vascular lesions, hyperpigmentation, lentignes, texture, rhytides, and pores. These changes occur under the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, as hormone alterations and exposure to ultraviolet light (UV) irradiation, respectively. Skin changes associated with aging have been assuming an important role in nowadays and bring to affect the quality of life. Intense Pulsed Light (ILP) is a noncollimated, polychromatic, and noncoherent non-surgical cosmetic therapy to skin rejuvenation. This is the first systematic review evaluating ILP treatment on skin rejuvenation evaluated by digital photographs and self-reported treatment efficacy. A PRISMA compliant review includes a search of the databases Scopus and PubMed. Sixteen studies treating 637 participants (with Fitzpatrick skin types I to IV and age varying from 21 to 80 years) were included. Patients were treated a mean of 4.29 sessions (range 3-7). The most studies results showed the efficacy of IPL treatment in telangiectasia, wrinkles, pore, erythema, rhytids, texture, lentigines, hiperpigmentation, and photoaging score. Six studies showed IPL-positive effects in association with other treatment and seven studies showed superior effect of other treatment or association to IPL with other treatment related to IPL alone. Nine studies showed low methodological quality. In conclusion, ILP treatment is effective on skin rejuvenation. However, there is no consensus about the parameters and future studies are needed to sample size limitations, made RCTs with low risk of bias, and improve the methodological quality its. Trial registration: Prospero Systematic Review Registration ID: CRD42021237817.

Keywords: Intense Pulsed Light; Rejuvenation; Skin; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Augustyniak A, Rotsztejn H (2017) Intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment for the skin in the eye area–clinical and cutometric analysis. J Cosmet Laser Ther 19:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2016.1247963 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Babilas P, Schreml S, Landthaler M et al (2010) Photodynamic therapy in dermatology: state-of-the-art. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 26:118–132 - DOI
    1. Babilas P, Schreml S, Szeimies RM et al (2010) Intense pulsed light (IPL): a review. Lasers Surg Med 42:93–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0781.2010.00507.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barikbin B, Akbari Z, Vafaee R et al (2019) The efficacy of IPL in periorbital skin rejuvenation: An open-label study. J Lasers Med Sci 10:S64–S67. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2019.S12 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Baumann L (2018) How to use oral and topical cosmeceuticals to prevent and treat skin aging. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2018.06.002 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources