Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Aug;16(4):775-781.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01312-6. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Leonardo Solaini  1   2 , Davide Cavaliere  3 , Andrea Avanzolini  3 , Giuseppe Rocco  3 , Giorgio Ercolani  4   3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Leonardo Solaini et al. J Robot Surg. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to review the latest evidence on the robotic approach (RHR) for inguinal hernia repair comparing the pooled outcome of this technique with those of the standard laparoscopic procedure (LHR). A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus for studies published between 2010 and 2021 concerning the comparison between RHR versus LHR. After screening 582 articles, 9 articles with a total of 64,426 patients (7589 RHRs) were eligible for inclusion. Among preoperative variables, a pooled higher ratio of ASA > 2 patients was found in the robotic group (12.4 vs 8.6%, p < 0.001). Unilateral hernia repair was more common in the laparoscopic group (79.9 vs 68.1, p < 0.001). Overall, operative time was longer in the robotic group (160 vs 90 min, p < 0.001); this was confirmed also in the sub-analysis on unilateral procedures (88 vs 68 min, p = 0.040). The operative time for robotic bilateral repair was similar to the laparoscopic one (111 vs 100, p = 0.797). Conversion to open surgery was 0% in the robotic group. The pooled rate of chronic pain and postoperative complications was similar between the groups. The standardized mean difference MD of the costs between LHR versus RHR was - 3270$ (95% CI - 4757 to - 1782, p < 0.001). In conclusion, laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair have similar safety parameters and postoperative outcomes. Robotic approach may require longer operative time if the unilateral repair is performed. Costs are higher in the robotic group.

Keywords: Groin hernia repair; Minimally invasive repair; Robotic hernia surgery; Robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Finley DS, Rodriguez E, Jr, Ahlering TE. Combined inguinal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh during transperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a 4-year experience. J Urol. 2007;178(4 Pt 1):1296–1299. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.154. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bullen NL, Massey LH, Antoniou SA, Smart NJ, Fortelny RH. Open versus laparoscopic mesh repair of primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Hernia. 2019;23(3):461–472. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01989-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. HerniaSurge Group International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018;22(1):1–165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aghayeva A, Benlice C, Bilgin IA, Bengur FB, Bas M, Kirbiyik E, Aytac E, Baca B. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal vs robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: assessment of short- and long-term outcomes. Int J Med Robot. 2020;16(4):e2111. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2111. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charles EJ. Inguinal hernia repair: is there a benefit to using the robot? Hernia. 2018;32(4):2131–2136. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5911-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources