Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;60(3-04):104-109.
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1736312. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

Natural Language Mapping of Electrocardiogram Interpretations to a Standardized Ontology

Richard H Epstein  1 , Yuel-Kai Jean  1 , Roman Dudaryk  1 , Robert E Freundlich  2 , Jeremy P Walco  2 , Dorothee A Mueller  2 , Shawn E Banks  1
Affiliations

Natural Language Mapping of Electrocardiogram Interpretations to a Standardized Ontology

Richard H Epstein et al. Methods Inf Med. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Interpretations of the electrocardiogram (ECG) are often prepared using software outside the electronic health record (EHR) and imported via an interface as a narrative note. Thus, natural language processing is required to create a computable representation of the findings. Challenges include misspellings, nonstandard abbreviations, jargon, and equivocation in diagnostic interpretations.

Objectives: Our objective was to develop an algorithm to reliably and efficiently extract such information and map it to the standardized ECG ontology developed jointly by the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology Foundation, and the Heart Rhythm Society. The algorithm was to be designed to be easily modifiable for use with EHRs and ECG reporting systems other than the ones studied.

Methods: An algorithm using natural language processing techniques was developed in structured query language to extract and map quantitative and diagnostic information from ECG narrative reports to the cardiology societies' standardized ECG ontology. The algorithm was developed using a training dataset of 43,861 ECG reports and applied to a test dataset of 46,873 reports.

Results: Accuracy, precision, recall, and the F1-measure were all 100% in the test dataset for the extraction of quantitative data (e.g., PR and QTc interval, atrial and ventricular heart rate). Performances for matches in each diagnostic category in the standardized ECG ontology were all above 99% in the test dataset. The processing speed was approximately 20,000 reports per minute. We externally validated the algorithm from another institution that used a different ECG reporting system and found similar performance.

Conclusion: The developed algorithm had high performance for creating a computable representation of ECG interpretations. Software and lookup tables are provided that can easily be modified for local customization and for use with other EHR and ECG reporting systems. This algorithm has utility for research and in clinical decision-support where incorporation of ECG findings is desired.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

    1. Williams CB, Andrade JG, Hawkins NM, et al. Establishing reference ranges for ambulatory electrocardiography parameters: meta-analysis. Heart 2020;106(22):1732–1739 - PubMed
    1. Smulyan H The computerized ECG: friend and foe. Am J Med 2019;132(02):153–160 - PubMed
    1. Turley A, Roberts A, Evemy K, Haq I, Irvine T, Adams P. Diagnostic accuracy of automated computerised electrocardiogram interpretation compared with a panel of experienced cardiologists. Crit Care 2007;11(02):245
    1. Rasmussen LV. The electronic health record for translational research. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2014;7(06):607–614 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mason JW, Hancock EW, Gettes LS, et al.; American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology American College of Cardiology Foundation Heart Rhythm Society. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part II: electrocardiography diagnostic statement list a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49(10):1128–1135 - PubMed

Publication types