Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 15;224(12):2001-2009.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab498.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Seroassay Performance and Optimization in a Population With High Background Reactivity in Mali

Affiliations

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Seroassay Performance and Optimization in a Population With High Background Reactivity in Mali

John Woodford et al. J Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: False positivity may hinder the utility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serological tests in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods: From 312 Malian samples collected before 2020, we measured antibodies to the commonly tested SARS-CoV-2 antigens and 4 other betacoronaviruses by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In a subset of samples, we assessed antibodies to a panel of Plasmodium falciparum antigens by suspension bead array and functional antiviral activity by SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus neutralization assay. We then evaluated the performance of an ELISA using SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and receptor-binding domain developed in the United States using Malian positive and negative control samples. To optimize test performance, we compared single- and 2-antigen approaches using existing assay cutoffs and population-specific cutoffs.

Results: Background reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 antigens was common in prepandemic Malian samples. The SARS-CoV-2 reactivity varied between communities, increased with age, and correlated negligibly/weakly with other betacoronavirus and P falciparum antibodies. No prepandemic samples demonstrated functional activity. Regardless of the cutoffs applied, test specificity improved using a 2-antigen approach. Test performance was optimal using a 2-antigen assay with population-specific cutoffs (sensitivity, 73.9% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 51.6-89.8]; specificity, 99.4% [95% CI, 97.7-99.9]).

Conclusions: We have addressed the problem of SARS-CoV-2 seroassay performance in Africa by using a 2-antigen assay with cutoffs defined by performance in the target population.

Keywords: Africa; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; malaria; serology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow chart. CoV, coronavirus; NCP, nucleocapsid protein; P falciparum, Plasmodium falciparum; RBD, receptor binding domain; ROC, receiver operator characteristic; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antigen immunoglobulin G reactivity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in coronavirus disease 2019-naive samples Malian samples: spike protein (n=311), receptor binding domain ([RBD] n=312), nucleocapsid protein ([NCP] n=233). OD, optical density.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen immunoglobulin G reactivity by site in coronavirus disease 2019-naive Malian samples (≥18 years only). (A) Spike protein (B) receptor binding domain (RBD), (C) nucleocapsid protein (NCP). Groups compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. P values corrected adjusted multiple comparisons using the Holm-Sidak method. K’bougou, Kalifabougou site; Med, median optical density (OD) value; O’bougou, Ouelessebougou site.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen immunoglobulin G reactivity by age group in coronavirus disease 2019-naive Malian samples (<10, 10–17, ≥18 years, Kalifabougou site). (A) Spike protein (B) receptor binding domain (RBD), (C) nucleocapsid protein (NCP). Groups compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. P values corrected for multiple comparisons using the Holm-Sidak method. K’bougou, Kalifabougou site; Med, median optical density (OD) value.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Correlation matrix of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen immunoglobulin G reactivity in coronavirus disease 2019-naive Malian samples with (A) 4 other betacoronavirus spike proteins (Pearson r). (B) A panel of 11 Plasmodium falciparum antigens (Spearman r). Plasmodium falciparum antigen panel: MSP1.19, merozoite surface, long-lived antibody response; MSP-2.Dd2, merozoite surface; MSP-2.CH150, merozoite surface; GLURP.R2, merozoite, long-lived antibody response; AMA-1, sporozoite/merozoite, long-lived antibody response; Rh2.2030, merozoite, short-lived antibody response; GEXP18, gametocyte, short-lived antibody response; HSP40.Ag1, infected erythrocyte/gametocyte, short-lived antibody response; Hyp2, infected erythrocyte/parasitophorous vacuole membrane; Etramp5.Ag1, infected erythrocyte/parasitophorous vacuole membrane, short-lived antibody response; Etramp4.Ag2, infected erythrocyte/parasitophorous vacuole membrane. MERS, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; NCP, nucleocapsid protein; RBD, receptor binding domain; SARS, SARS-CoV-1; SARS2, SARS-CoV-2.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
The performance of US cutoffs in Malian positive control (n=23) and negative control (n=311) samples. OD, optical density; RBD, receptor binding domain. Dotted lines represent US assay cutoffs for spike protein: 0.674 and RBD: 0.306 [10]. Quadrant A (spike negative, RBD positive): positive control: 1/23, negative control: 65/311. Quadrant B (spike negative, RBD negative): positive control: 3/23, negative control: 225/311. Quadrant C (spike positive, RBD positive): positive control: 18/23, negative control: 8/311. Quadrant D (spike positive, RBD negative): positive control: 1/23, negative control: 13/311.

Update of

References

    1. Bryant JE, Azman AS, Ferrari MJ, et al. Serology for SARS-CoV-2: apprehensions, opportunities, and the path forward. Sci Immunol 2020; 5:eabc6347. - PubMed
    1. Theel ES, Couturier MR, Filkins L, et al. Application, verification, and implementation of SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays with emergency use authorization. J Clin Microbiol 2020; 59:e02148–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tso FY, Lidenge SJ, Peña PB, et al. High prevalence of pre-existing serological cross-reactivity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Infect Dis 2021; 102:577–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yadouleton A, Sander AL, Moreira-Soto A, et al. Limited specificity of serologic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection, Benin. Emerg Infect Dis 2021; 27:233–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nkuba Ndaye A, Hoxha A, Madinga J, et al. Challenges in interpreting SARS-CoV-2 serological results in African countries. Lancet Glob Health 2021; 9:e588–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types