Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 6;7(10):e32468.
doi: 10.2196/32468.

Effectiveness of Contact Tracing for Viral Disease Mitigation and Suppression: Evidence-Based Review

Affiliations
Review

Effectiveness of Contact Tracing for Viral Disease Mitigation and Suppression: Evidence-Based Review

Kelly Jean Thomas Craig et al. JMIR Public Health Surveill. .

Abstract

Background: Contact tracing in association with quarantine and isolation is an important public health tool to control outbreaks of infectious diseases. This strategy has been widely implemented during the current COVID-19 pandemic. The effectiveness of this nonpharmaceutical intervention is largely dependent on social interactions within the population and its combination with other interventions. Given the high transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2, short serial intervals, and asymptomatic transmission patterns, the effectiveness of contact tracing for this novel viral agent is largely unknown.

Objective: This study aims to identify and synthesize evidence regarding the effectiveness of contact tracing on infectious viral disease outcomes based on prior scientific literature.

Methods: An evidence-based review was conducted to identify studies from the PubMed database, including preprint medRxiv server content, related to the effectiveness of contact tracing in viral outbreaks. The search dates were from database inception to July 24, 2020. Outcomes of interest included measures of incidence, transmission, hospitalization, and mortality.

Results: Out of 159 unique records retrieved, 45 (28.3%) records were reviewed at the full-text level, and 24 (15.1%) records met all inclusion criteria. The studies included utilized mathematical modeling (n=14), observational (n=8), and systematic review (n=2) approaches. Only 2 studies considered digital contact tracing. Contact tracing was mostly evaluated in combination with other nonpharmaceutical interventions and/or pharmaceutical interventions. Although some degree of effectiveness in decreasing viral disease incidence, transmission, and resulting hospitalizations and mortality was observed, these results were highly dependent on epidemic severity (R0 value), number of contacts traced (including presymptomatic and asymptomatic cases), timeliness, duration, and compliance with combined interventions (eg, isolation, quarantine, and treatment). Contact tracing effectiveness was particularly limited by logistical challenges associated with increased outbreak size and speed of infection spread.

Conclusions: Timely deployment of contact tracing strategically layered with other nonpharmaceutical interventions could be an effective public health tool for mitigating and suppressing infectious outbreaks by decreasing viral disease incidence, transmission, and resulting hospitalizations and mortality.

Keywords: COVID-19; contact tracing; effectiveness; epidemic; intervention; isolation; mitigation; monitoring; non-pharmaceutical interventions; outcome; pandemic; protection; review; spread; surveillance; testing; transmission; viral disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors are employed by IBM Corporation and declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results of the literature search. Summary of all articles identified by systematic search queries and tracking of articles that were included and excluded across the study screening phases with reasons for exclusion of full texts.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kwok KO, Tang A, Wei VWI, Park WH, Yeoh EK, Riley S. Epidemic models of contact tracing: systematic review of transmission studies of severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2019;17:186–194. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.01.003. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2001-0370(18)30170-3 S2001-0370(18)30170-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silenou BC, Tom-Aba D, Adeoye O, Arinze CC, Oyiri F, Suleman AK, Yinka-Ogunleye A, Dörrbecker Juliane, Ihekweazu C, Krause G. Use of surveillance outbreak response management and analysis system for human monkeypox outbreak, Nigeria, 2017-2019. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Feb;26(2):345–349. doi: 10.3201/eid2602.191139. doi: 10.3201/eid2602.191139. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swanson KC, Altare C, Wesseh CS, Nyenswah T, Ahmed T, Eyal N, Hamblion EL, Lessler J, Peters DH, Altmann M. Contact tracing performance during the Ebola epidemic in Liberia, 2014-2015. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Sep;12(9):e0006762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006762. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006762 PNTD-D-18-00528 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saurabh S, Prateek S. Role of contact tracing in containing the 2014 Ebola outbreak: a review. Afr Health Sci. 2017 Mar;17(1):225–236. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v17i1.28. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29026397 jAFHS.v17.i1.pg225 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Considerations for the Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Workforce: Enhancing Access to COVID-19 Vaccination Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021. [2021-09-27]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/contact-tracing/vaccine-su... .

Publication types

MeSH terms