What are the current and projected future cost and health-related quality of life implications of scaling up cognitive stimulation therapy?
- PMID: 34613622
- DOI: 10.1002/gps.5633
What are the current and projected future cost and health-related quality of life implications of scaling up cognitive stimulation therapy?
Abstract
Objectives: Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) is one of the few non-pharmacological interventions for people living with dementia shown to be effective and cost-effective. What are the current and future cost and health-related quality of life implications of scaling-up CST to eligible new cases of dementia in England?
Methods/design: Data from trials were combined with microsimulation and macrosimulation modelling to project future prevalence, needs and costs. Health and social costs, unpaid care costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were compared with and without scaling-up of CST and follow-on maintenance CST (MCST).
Results: Scaling-up group CST requires year-on-year increases in expenditure (mainly on staff), but these would be partially offset by reductions in health and care costs. Unpaid care costs would increase. Scaling-up MCST would also require additional expenditure, but without generating savings elsewhere. There would be improvements in general cognitive functioning and health-related quality of life, summarised in terms of QALY gains. Cost per QALY for CST alone would increase from £12,596 in 2015 to £19,573 by 2040, which is below the threshold for cost-effectiveness used by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Cost per QALY for CST and MCST combined would grow from £19,883 in 2015 to £30,906 by 2040, making it less likely to be recommended by NICE on cost-effectiveness grounds.
Conclusions: Scaling-up CST England for people with incident dementia can improve lives in an affordable, cost-effective manner. Adding MCST also improves health-related quality of life, but the economic evidence is less compelling.
Keywords: cognitive stimulation therapy; cost; dementia; economic evaluation; quality adjusted life year; scaling-up.
© 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;396(10248):413-446.
-
- Mukadam N, Anderson R, Knapp M, et al. Effective interventions for potentially modifiable late-onset dementia risk factors: their costs and cost-effectiveness. Lancet Healthy Longevity. 2020;1(1):e13-e20.
-
- Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Solomon A, et al. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9984):2255-2263.
-
- Bauer A, Wittenberg R, Ly A, et al. Valuing Alzheimer's disease drugs: a health technology assessment perspective on outcomes. Int J Tech Assess. 2020;36(4):297-303.
-
- Wittenberg R, Hu B, Jagger C, et al. Projections of care for older people with dementia in England: 2015 to 2040. Age Ageing. 2020;49(2):264-269.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
