Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 7;8(1):52.
doi: 10.1186/s40779-021-00345-0.

Secondary analysis of malaria rapid diagnostic tests from rounds 5-8 of WHO product testing with a focus on false-negative results

Affiliations

Secondary analysis of malaria rapid diagnostic tests from rounds 5-8 of WHO product testing with a focus on false-negative results

Biao Xu et al. Mil Med Res. .

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in clinical practice, there are a lot of challenges. We conducted a secondary analysis of 129 malaria RDT data from rounds 5-8 of the World Health Organization (WHO) product testing summary and discuss the causes of false-negative (FN) results with a focus on low parasite density, improper RDT storage, operation and interpretation, and plasmodium falciparum with a pfhrp2/3 gene deletion. The results demonstrated that the malaria RDTs currently commercially available might cause FN results in practice.

Keywords: False-negative results; Malaria; Rapid diagnostic tests; WHO product testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Assessment of malaria RDT performance in rounds 5–8 against wild type (clinical) samples containing Pf (a) and Pv (b) at 200 parasites/µl (%). Pf Plasmodium falciparum, Pv Plasmodium vivax, Pan all Plasmodium species, Pvom Plasmodium vivax, ovale and malariae

References

    1. World Health Organization (2018). Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 8 (2016–2018). https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/276190
    1. Kavanaugh MJ, Azzam SE, Rockabrand DM. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests: literary review and recommendation for a quality assurance, quality control algorithm. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11(5):768. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050768. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (2018). Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: summary results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 1–8 (2008–2018). https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/276193
    1. Plucinski MM, Dimbu PR, Fortes F, Murphy SC, Smith NT, Cruz KR, et al. Malaria parasite density in individuals with different rapid diagnostic test results and concentrations of HRP2 antigen. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;100:1202–1203. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seidahmed OM, Mohamedein MM, Elsir AA, Ali FT, el Malik FM, Ahmed ES. End-user errors in applying two malaria rapid diagnostic tests in a remote area of Sudan. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:406–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02015.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances