Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Dec 1;7(12):1791-1799.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4301.

Fulvestrant-Palbociclib vs Letrozole-Palbociclib as Initial Therapy for Endocrine-Sensitive, Hormone Receptor-Positive, ERBB2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Fulvestrant-Palbociclib vs Letrozole-Palbociclib as Initial Therapy for Endocrine-Sensitive, Hormone Receptor-Positive, ERBB2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Antonio Llombart-Cussac et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Importance: The cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole has become a standard first-line treatment for patients with endocrine-sensitive, hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative advanced breast cancer. Meanwhile, the antiestrogen fulvestrant was shown to be superior to anastrozole in the absence of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibition for this patient population.

Objective: To assess whether fulvestrant is superior to letrozole when combined with palbociclib in the first-line scenario.

Design, setting, and participants: In this international, randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical study conducted from July 30, 2015, to January 8, 2018, patients with hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative advanced breast cancer with no prior therapy in the metastatic setting and endocrine-sensitive criteria were recruited from 47 centers in 7 countries. Data were analyzed from February 11 to May 15, 2020.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive palbociclib with either fulvestrant or letrozole. Stratification factors were type of disease presentation (de novo vs recurrent) and the presence of visceral involvement (yes vs no).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.

Results: A total of 486 women (median age, 63 years [range, 25-90 years]; 3 Asian women [0.6%]; 4 Black women [0.8%]; 461 White women [94.9%]; 18 women of unknown race [3.7%]) were randomized (243 to fulvestrant-palbociclib and 243 to letrozole-palbociclib). Median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 27.9 months (95% CI, 24.2-33.1 months) in the fulvestrant-palbociclib group vs 32.8 months (95% CI, 25.8-35.9 months) in the letrozole-palbociclib group (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.89-1.45; P = .32). This result was consistent across the stratification factors. No significant differences were observed in objective response rate (46.5% vs 50.2%) and 3-year overall survival rate (79.4% vs 77.1%) for fulvestrant-palbociclib and letrozole-palbociclib, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events were comparable among treatment groups, and no new safety signals were identified. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Conclusions and relevance: Although fulvestrant-palbociclib demonstrated significant antitumor activity, this randomized clinical trial failed to identify an improvement in progression-free survival with this regimen over letrozole-palbociclib in patients with endocrine-sensitive, hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02491983.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Llombart-Cussac reported playing a leadership role at Eisai, Celgene, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp; intellectual property for Medica Scientia Innovation Research and Initia-Research; serving in a consulting role for Lilly, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Genomic Health, and GlaxoSmithKline; being part of the speaker bureau for Lilly, AstraZeneca, and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp; receiving research funding from Roche, Foundation Medicine, Pierre-Fabre, and Agendia; and receiving travel compensation from Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study. Dr Pérez-García reported having a consulting role for Roche, Lilly, and Daichii-Sankyo; receiving travel compensation from Roche; and being a part-time employee of Medica Scientia Innovation Research during the conduct of the study. Dr Bellet reported receiving honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, and Lilly; travel compensation from Pfizer and Roche; having a consulting role for Pfizer, Novartis, and Lilly; and being part of the speaker bureau for Pfizer, Novartis, and Lilly during the conduct of the study. Dr Gil-Gil reported receiving honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, and Eisai; receiving travel compensation from Khern, Daiichi, Pfizer, and Roche; and serving as a consultant to Daiichi, Agendia, and Genomic Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Ruíz-Borrego reported serving as a consultant to Novartis, Pfizer, and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp; and serving on the speaker bureau for Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Lilly, and AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study. Dr Gavilá reported receiving honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, and Roche; receiving travel compensation from Roche; serving as a consultant to Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp; and being on the speaker bureau for Novartis and Pfizer during the conduct of the study. Mr Sampayo-Cordero reported receiving honoraria from Medica Scientia Innovation Research, Syntax for Science, and Nestlé; research funding from Medica Scientia Innovation Research, Syntax for Science, and Roche; travel compensation from Medica Scientia Innovation Research, Syntax for Science, and Roche; serving as a consultant to Medica Scientia Innovation Research, Syntax for Science, and Nestlé; being on the speaker bureau for Medica Scientia Innovation Research, Syntax for Science, and Roche; and being a part-time employee of Medica Scientia Innovation Research during the conduct of the study. Dr Aguirre reported having a consulting role with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Roche during the conduct of the study. Dr Schmid reported receiving honoraria from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, Merck, and Boehringer Ingelheim; having a consulting role for Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Eisai, Celgene, and Puma; and having institutional grants from Roche, Genentech, Oncogenex, and Novartis during the conduct of the study. Dr Marmé reported receiving honoraria from Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Tesaro, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Celgene, Genomic Health, PharmaMar, Amgen, CureVac, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp Oncology, Janssen-Cilag, and ImmunoMedics (to the institution); institutional research funding from Roche/Genentech, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Tesaro, Clovis, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp Oncology, and Vaccibody; travel compensation from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, PharmaMar, and AstraZeneca; and serving as a consultant to Tesaro, Pfizer, Novartis, GenomicHealth, CureVac, Amgen, Celgene, Eisai, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca (to institution), Roche (to institution), Vaccibody (to institution), and ImmunoMedics (to institution) during the conduct of the study. Dr Di Cosimo reported receiving fees for medical education from Novartis and Pierre-Fabre; being a recipient of the IG20774 of Fondazione Associazione Italiana Ricerca contro il Cancro; and being a part-time employee of Medica Scientia Innovation Research during the conduct of the study. Dr Gligorov reported serving as a consultant to Daiichi, Eisai, Genomic Health, Immunomedics, Ipsen, Macrogenics, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Mylan, Novartis, Onxeo, Pfizer, and Roche; being on the speaker bureau for Eisai, Genomic Health, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; receiving research funding from Eisai, Genomic Health, and Roche; and receiving travel compensation from Eisai, Genomic Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche during the conduct of the study. Dr Schneeweiss reported receiving honoraria from Roche, Celgene, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Tesaro, and Lilly; research funding from Celgene, Roche, AbbVie, and Molecular Partner; travel compensation from Celgene and Roche; and providing expert testimony for Roche and AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study. Dr Albanell reported receiving grants from Medica Scientia Innovation Research; serving as a consultant to Pfizer, Roche, Amgen, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, and Lilly; being part of the speaker bureau for Roche and Pfizer; receiving research funding from Roche and Seattle Genetics, travel compensation from Roche, Pfizer, Amgen, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, and Lilly, and royalties from Biocartis; having a patent for EGFRmut licensed to Biocartis; and having a patent for InBiomotion during the conduct of the study. Dr Zamora reported receiving research funding from Roche and travel compensation from Roche and Pfizer during the course of the study. Dr Wheatley reported receiving honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, Daiichii Sankyo, Novartis, and Lilly; receiving travel compensation from Roche; serving as a consultant to Pfizer, Roche, and Lilly; being on the speaker bureau for Lilly, Pfizer, and Novartis; and receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca for work on the advisory board during the course of the study. Dr Martínez-de Dueñas reported receiving honoraria from Pfizer; travel compensation from Roche; and serving as a consultant to Pfizer and Novartis during the course of the study. Dr Malfettone reported being a full-time employee of Medica Scientia Innovation Research. Dr Cortés reported serving as a consultant to Roche, Celgene, Cellestia, AstraZeneca, Biothera Pharmaceutical, Merus, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Erytech, Athenex, Polyphor, Lilly, Servier, Merck Sharp & Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline, Leuko, Bioasis, and Clovis Oncology; providing intellectual property to Medica Scientia Innovation Research; receiving honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Celgene, Eisai, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Daiichi Sankyo; and receiving institutional research funding from Roche, Ariad Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Baxalta GMBH/Servier Affaires, Bayer Healthcare, Eisai, Hoffmann-La Roche, Guardant Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Piqur Therapeutics, Puma C, and Queen Mary University of London during the course of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Patient Diagram
All randomized patients were included in the intention-to-treat population; randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment were included in the safety population. aOf 2 patients who did not receive study treatment, 1 patient was mistakenly included because she did not meet the selection criterion (presence of uncontrolled brain metastases), and 1 patient was discontinued per the investigator’s decision. bOne patient did not receive study treatment because the patient withdrew consent.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Kaplan-Meier Curve for Investigator-Assessed Progression-Free Survival in the Intent-to-Treat Population
HR indicates hazard ratio.

References

    1. Cardoso F, Costa A, Senkus E, et al. . 3rd ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3). Ann Oncol. 2017;28(1):16-33. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw544 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. . Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(7):1541-1547. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy155 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rugo HS, Finn RS, Diéras V, et al. . Palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line therapy in estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer with extended follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;174(3):719-729. doi:10.1007/s10549-018-05125-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnston S, Martin M, Di Leo A, et al. . MONARCH 3 final PFS: a randomized study of abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019;5:5. doi:10.1038/s41523-018-0097-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L, et al. . Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(30):4594-4600. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.28.8415 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources