Normal Values of Aortic Root Size According to Age, Sex, and Race: Results of the World Alliance of Societies of Echocardiography Study
- PMID: 34619294
- PMCID: PMC9111967
- DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2021.09.011
Normal Values of Aortic Root Size According to Age, Sex, and Race: Results of the World Alliance of Societies of Echocardiography Study
Erratum in
-
Correction.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023 Oct;36(10):1126. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2023.07.009. Epub 2023 Aug 4. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023. PMID: 37542502 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Accurate measurements of the aortic annulus and root are important for guiding therapeutic decisions regarding the need for aortic surgery. Current echocardiographic guidelines for identification of aortic root dilatation are limited because current normative values were derived predominantly from white individuals in narrow age ranges, and based partially on M-mode measurements. Using data from the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography study, the authors sought to establish normal ranges of aortic dimensions across sexes, races, and a wide range of ages.
Methods: Adult individuals free of heart, lung, and kidney disease were prospectively enrolled from 15 countries, with even distributions among sexes and age groups: young (18-40 years), middle aged (41-65 years) and old (>65 years). Transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiograms of 1,585 subjects (mean age, 47 ± 17 years; 50.4% men; mean body surface area [BSA], 1.77 ± 0.22 m2) were analyzed in a core laboratory following American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. Measurements, indexed separately by BSA and by height, included the aortic annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, and sinotubular junction. Differences among age, sex, and racial groups were evaluated using unpaired two-tailed Student's t tests.
Results: All aortic root dimensions were larger in men compared with women. After indexing to BSA, all measured dimensions were significantly larger in women, whereas men continued to show larger dimensions after indexing to height. Of note, the upper limits of normal for all aortic dimensions were lower across all age groups, compared with the guidelines. Aortic dimensions were larger in older age groups in both sexes, a trend that persisted regardless of BSA or height adjustment. Last, differences in aortic dimensions were also observed according to race: Asians had the smallest nonindexed aortic dimensions at all levels.
Conclusions: There are significant differences in aortic dimensions according to sex, age, and race. Thus, current guideline-recommended normal ranges may need to be adjusted to account for these differences.
Keywords: 2D echocardiography; Aorta; Aortic root dimensions.
Copyright © 2021 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Normal Aortic Dimensions: From A-to-Z Score.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2022 Mar;35(3):275-277. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 14. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2022. PMID: 34915135 No abstract available.
References
-
- Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for Cardiac Chamber Quantification by Echocardiography in Adults: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:1–39.e14. - PubMed
-
- Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kramer-Fox R, O’Loughlin J. Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. Am J Cardiol 1989;64:507–12. - PubMed
-
- Asch FM, Banchs J, Price R, Rigolin V, Thomas JD, Weissman NJ, et al. Need for a Global Definition of Normative Echo Values—Rationale and Design of the World Alliance of Societies of Echocardiography Normal Values Study (WASE). J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2019;32:157–62.e2. - PubMed
-
- Dubois D, Dubois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med 1916;17:863–71.
-
- Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, Canaday B, Finstuen JA, Foster MC, et al. Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Transthoracic Echocardiographic Examination in Adults: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2019;32:1–64. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
