Perceval Implantation and Ascending Replacement: Which Should Be Performed First?
- PMID: 34619796
- PMCID: PMC8526151
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730008
Perceval Implantation and Ascending Replacement: Which Should Be Performed First?
Abstract
The use of sutureless prostheses has expanded due to their ability to reduce surgical times, thus favoring their implantation in high-risk patients. It is not uncommon that these patients have an ascending aortic aneurysm requiring treatment with a vascular prosthesis; therefore, using a sutureless aortic valve may be associated. To date, however, little is known about the time sequence of this intervention, that is, if sutureless implantation should precede or follow that of the vascular prosthesis.
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this article.
Figures


References
-
- Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, Fischlein T. Perceval sutureless approach in a patient with porcelain aorta unsuitable for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol. 2012;155(01):168–170. - PubMed
-
- Pfeiffer S, Sirch J, Vogt F, Fischlein T, Santarpino G. Implantation of the Sorin Perceval sutureless aortic valve: a step by step approach. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2017;65(02):184–192. - PubMed
-
- Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, Concistré G, Grossmann I, Hinzmann M, Fischlein T.The Perceval S aortic valve has the potential of shortening surgical time: does it also result in improved outcome? Ann Thorac Surg 2013960177–81., discussion 81–82 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources