Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 30;13(1):e12243.
doi: 10.1002/dad2.12243. eCollection 2021.

Unsupervised mobile cognitive testing for use in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

Affiliations

Unsupervised mobile cognitive testing for use in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

Kathryn V Papp et al. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). .

Abstract

Introduction: Unsupervised digital cognitive testing is an appealing means to capture subtle cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here, we describe development, feasibility, and validity of the Boston Remote Assessment for Neurocognitive Health (BRANCH) against in-person cognitive testing and amyloid/tau burden.

Methods: BRANCH is web-based, self-guided, and assesses memory processes vulnerable in AD. Clinically normal participants (n = 234; aged 50-89) completed BRANCH; a subset underwent in-person cognitive testing and positron emission tomography imaging. Mean accuracy across BRANCH tests (Categories, Face-Name-Occupation, Groceries, Signs) was calculated.

Results: BRANCH was feasible to complete on participants' own devices (primarily smartphones). Technical difficulties and invalid/unusable data were infrequent. BRANCH psychometric properties were sound, including good retest reliability. BRANCH was correlated with in-person cognitive testing (r = 0.617, P < .001). Lower BRANCH score was associated with greater amyloid (r = -0.205, P = .007) and entorhinal tau (r = -0.178, P = .026).

Discussion: BRANCH reliably captures meaningful cognitive information remotely, suggesting promise as a digital cognitive marker sensitive early in the AD trajectory.

Keywords: digital biomarkers; mobile testing; preclinical Alzheimer's disease; unsupervised assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A. Samaroo, H.C. Chou, O.R. Schneider, D. Soberanes, M. Properzi, J. Burke, R. Kumar, S. Hsieh, N. Snyder, A. Schultz, Iván García‐Magariño, R. Buckley, Y. Quiroz, and R. Amariglio report no disclosures relevant to this manuscript. K. Papp has served as a paid consultant for Biogen and Digital Cognition Technologies. G. Marshall has served as a paid consultant for Grifols Shared Services North America, Inc. and Eisai Inc. He has received honoraria/payments from Miller Medical, South Shore Hospital, and Metrowest Medical Center. D. Rentz has served as a paid consultant for Biogen, Digital Cognition Technologies, Eli Lilly, and Janssen. R. Sperling has received honoraria from Shionogi, Genentech, Oligomerix, Inc., Cytox, Prothena, Acumen, JOMDD, Renew, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Neuraly, Janssen, Neurocentria, AC Immune, Biogen, Eisai, Roche, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. K. Johnson has received consulting fees from Novartis and Cerveau.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic of Boston Remote Assessment for Neurocognitive Health (BRANCH) tasks.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Boston Remote Assessment for Neurocognitive Health (BRANCH) Test‐Retest Reliability. Note: The graph shows the correlation (r = 0.81, P < .001) between BRANCH composite performance at first (Test) and second (Retest) administration among 31 registry participants indicating good retest reliability
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Associations between Boston Remote Assessment for Neurocognitive Health (BRANCH) composite performance and age, positron emission tomography amyloid and tau, and Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC‐5) score. For age sample, n = 234; for PACC‐5 sample, n = 160; for Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) sample, n = 144; for flortaucipir (FTP) sample, n = 129; r values for PiB and FTP are controlled for age

References

    1. Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA‐AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(4):535‐562. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):280‐292. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doraiswamy PM, Narayan VA, Manji HK. Mobile and pervasive computing technologies and the future of Alzheimer's clinical trials. NPJ Digit Med. 2018;1(1):1‐4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Snitz BE, Tudorascu DL, Yu Z, et al. Associations between NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery and in vivo brain amyloid and tau pathology in non‐demented older adults. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2020;12(1):e12018‐e12018. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buckley RF, Sparks K, Papp K, et al. Computerized cognitive testing for use in clinical trials: a comparison of the NIH Toolbox and Cogstate C3 batteries. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2017;4(1):3. - PMC - PubMed