Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov;25(11):6027-6044.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04080-7. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

Current strategies for conservative endodontic access cavity preparation techniques-systematic review, meta-analysis, and decision-making protocol

Benoit Ballester  1   2 , Thomas Giraud  1   3 , Hany Mohamed Aly Ahmed  4 , Mohamed Shady Nabhan  5 , Frédéric Bukiet  6   7 , Maud Guivarc'h  1   8
Affiliations
Review

Current strategies for conservative endodontic access cavity preparation techniques-systematic review, meta-analysis, and decision-making protocol

Benoit Ballester et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess related studies and discuss the clinical implications of endodontic access cavity (AC) designs.

Materials and methods: A systematic review of studies comparing the fracture resistance and/or endodontic outcomes between different AC designs was conducted in two electronic search databases (PubMed and Web of Science) following the PRISMA guidelines. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed. Meta-analyses were undertaken for fracture resistance and root canal detection, with the level of significance set at 0.05 (P = 0.05).

Results: A total of 33 articles were included in this systematic review. The global evaluation of the risk of bias in the included studies was assessed as moderate, and the level of evidence was rated as low. Four types of AC designs were categorized: traditional (TradAC), conservative (ConsAC), ultraconservative (UltraAC), and truss (TrussAC). Their impact on fracture resistance, cleaning/disinfection, procedural errors, root canal detection, treatment time, apical debris extrusion, and root canal filling was discussed. Meta-analysis showed that compared to TradAC, (i) there is a significant higher fracture resistance of teeth with ConsAC, TrussAC, or ConsAC/TrussAC when all marginal ridges are preserved (P < 0.05), (ii) there is no significant effect of the type of AC on the fracture resistance of teeth when one or two marginal ridges are lost (P > 0.05), and (iii) there is a significantly higher risk of undetected canals with ConsAC if not assisted by dental operating microscope and ultrasonic troughing (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Decreasing the AC extent does not necessarily present mechanical and biological advantages especially when one or more surfaces of the tooth structure are lost. To date, the evidence available does not support the application of TrussAC. UltraAC might be applied in limited occasions.

Clinical relevance: Maintaining the extent of AC design as small as practical without jeopardizing the root canal treatment quality remains a pragmatic recommendation. Different criteria can guide the practitioner for the optimal extent of AC outline form which varies from case to case.

Keywords: Conservative access cavity; Endodontic access cavity; Minimally invasive access cavity; Root canal treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Christie WH, Thompson GK (1994) The importance of endodontic access in locating maxillary and mandibular molar canals. J Can Dent Assoc 60(6):527–532 (535-536) - PubMed
    1. Clark D, Khademi J (2010) Modern molar endodontic access and directed dentin conservation. Dent Clin North Am 54(2):249–273 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Bóveda C, Kishen A (2015) Contracted endodontic cavities: the foundation for less invasive alternatives in the management of apical periodontitis. Endod Top 33(1):169–186 - DOI
    1. Banerjee A (2015) The Contemporary Practice of Minimally Invasive Dentistry. Fac Dent J 6(2):78–85 - DOI
    1. Ahmed HMA, Gutmann JL (2015) Education for prevention: a viable pathway for minimal endodontic treatment intervention. ENDO 9:283–285

LinkOut - more resources