Current aspects of DNA damage and repair in ecotoxicology: a mini-review
- PMID: 34623548
- DOI: 10.1007/s10646-021-02487-2
Current aspects of DNA damage and repair in ecotoxicology: a mini-review
Abstract
The preservation of genomic stability against environmental stressors is a major adaptive feature that is well-conserved among both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The complex and fine-tuned mechanisms that evolved to repair DNA following exposure to radiation and chemical insult are also the first line of defence against genotoxicants. Consequently, impairing the DNA damage response leads to accumulation of genomic lesions that may ultimately lead to cell death, mutagenesis and even teratogenesis and neoplasia. Understanding how pollutants affect DNA repair machinery is thus paramount to interpret the often unclear or contradictory findings from genotoxicity assessment. The main purpose of the present mini-review is to contribute to the slowly-growing awareness among ecotoxicologists that DNA damage is not limited to direct interactions of noxious compounds with the DNA molecule. Despite the limited number of studies addressing this issue in the field, special modifications of methods for genotoxicity assessment, combined with state-of-the-art molecular tools, are beginning to show promising results in the unravelling of DNA repair proteins, genes and networks in non-conventional model organisms. I will review the essentials of the most important DNA repair pathways and discuss methods and approaches that can assist steering ecotoxicologists towards a better understanding of genotoxic hazard and risk.
Keywords: Biomarkers; Chemical insult; Genomic instability; Genotoxicity; Mutagenicity; Pollution.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Aas E, Baussant T, Balk L, Liewenborg B, Andersen OK (2000) PAH metabolites in bile, cytochrome P4501A and DNA adducts as environmental risk parameters for chronic oil exposure: a laboratory experiment with Atlantic cod. Aquat Toxicol 51:241–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-445x(00)00108-9 - DOI
-
- Ankley GT, Bennett RS, Erickson RJ, Hoff DJ, Hornung MW, Johnson RD, Mount DR, Nichols JW, Russom CL, Schmieder PK, Serrrano JA, Tietge JE, Villeneuve DL (2010) Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:730–741. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.34 - DOI
-
- Asmuss M, Mullenders LH, Eker A, Hartwig A (2000) Differential effects of toxic metal compounds on the activities of Fpg and XPA, two zinc finger proteins involved in DNA repair. Carcinogenesis 21:2097–2104. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/21.11.2097 - DOI
-
- Aubrey BJ, Kelly GL, Janic A, Herold MJ, Strasser A (2018) How does p53 induce apoptosis and how does this relate to p53-mediated tumour suppression? Cell Death Differ 25:104–113. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2017.169 - DOI
-
- Atkinson A, Roy D (1995) In vivo DNA adduct formation by bisphenol A. Environ Mol Mutagen 26:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.2850260109 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
