Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2022 Feb;129(2):227-230.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.019. Epub 2021 Oct 6.

Expert Performance in Visual Differentiation of Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis

Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

Expert Performance in Visual Differentiation of Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis

Travis K Redd et al. Ophthalmology. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

This study quantifies the performance of an international cohort of cornea specialists in image-based differentiation of bacterial and fungal keratitis, identifying significant regional variation and establishing a reference standard for comparison against machine learning models.

Keywords: Bacterial keratitis; Corneal ulcer; Fungal keratitis; Infectious keratitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: No conflicting relationships exists for any author

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Comparison of Performance Among Indian and non-Indian Cornea Specialists
A) Empirical receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the ensemble estimated probability of fungal keratitis among all cornea specialists combined (black), cornea specialists practicing in India (blue), and cornea specialists practicing outside India (orange). TPR = true positive rate. FPR = false positive rate. B) The three corneal ulcer images from the testing set which demonstrated the the largest difference in ensemble estimated probability between Indian (blue) and non-Indian (orange) expert image graders. Next to each image is the corresponding distribution of responses among both groups of experts. In all three examples the image was obtained from a case of culture-proven fungal keratitis, and in each case the ensemble prediction of Indian graders was closer to the ground truth than the ensemble prediction among non-Indian graders.

References

    1. Mcleod SD, Kolahdouz-isfahani A, Rostamian K, Flowers CW, Lee PP, Mcdonnell P. The Role of Smears, Cultures, and Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing in the Management of Suspected Infectious Keratitis. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:23–28. - PubMed
    1. Ghosh AK, Thammasudjarit R, Jongkhajornpong P, Attia J, Thakkinstian A. Deep Learning for Discrimination between Fungal Keratitis and Bacterial Keratitis: DeepKeratitis. Cornea. 2021; in press. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuo MT, Hsu BWY, Yin YK, et al. A deep learning approach in diagnosing fungal keratitis based on corneal photographs. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dalmon C, Porco TC, Lietman TM, et al. The clinical differentiation of bacterial and fungal keratitis: a photographic survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(4):1787–1791. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dahlgren MA, Lingappan A, Wilhelmus KR. The clinical diagnosis of microbial keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(6):940–944. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types