Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;56(4):175-195.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-103987. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance

Affiliations

Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance

Clare L Ardern et al. Br J Sports Med. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Poor reporting of medical and healthcare systematic reviews is a problem from which the sports and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation, and sports science fields are not immune. Transparent, accurate and comprehensive systematic review reporting helps researchers replicate methods, readers understand what was done and why, and clinicians and policy-makers implement results in practice. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and its accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document provide general reporting examples for systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. However, implementation guidance for sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation, and sports science does not exist. The Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science (PERSiST) guidance attempts to address this problem. Nineteen content experts collaborated with three methods experts to identify examples of exemplary reporting in systematic reviews in sport and exercise medicine (including physical activity), musculoskeletal rehabilitation (including physiotherapy), and sports science, for each of the PRISMA 2020 Statement items. PERSiST aims to help: (1) systematic reviewers improve the transparency and reporting of systematic reviews and (2) journal editors and peer reviewers make informed decisions about systematic review reporting quality.

Keywords: evaluation; implementation; meta-analysis; methodology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RA, MCA, FB, MC, SH, FMI, SM, MSR, GS, BV, JLW, MW and AAW declare they have no competing interests. CLA was a Deputy Editor (Systematic Reviews) for BJSM from 2016 to 2018. ED, HPD and AW are associate editors for BJSM. MCA was a member of the BJSM editorial board from 2008 to 2020. KMK was Editor-in-Chief of BJSM from 2008 to 2020. He holds no position with the BJSM or the BMJ Group at present (September 2021). DM is Chair of the PRISMA group, led the PRISMA 2009 statement and co-led the PRISMA 2020 statement. MJP co-led the PRISMA 2020 statement. ES was editor of BJSM from 2017 to 2020, and editor-in-chief of BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine from 2019 to 2020. He is a senior adviser to BJSM (September 2021).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram template for systematic reviews (reproduced with permission). PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of study characteristics presented in a summary table (reproduced with permission).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of how to present effect estimates in forest plots (reproduced with permission). M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Example of how to present domain-based risk of bias assessment results (reproduced with permission). ASAD, arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example of how to present results of sensitivity analyses (reproduced with permission).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Funnel plot for assessing publication bias (reproduced with permission). SE, standard error; SMD, standardised mean difference.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. . Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996;312:71–2. 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pussegoda K, Turner L, Garritty C, et al. . Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality. Syst Rev 2017;6:131. 10.1186/s13643-017-0527-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Page MJ, Shamseer L, Altman DG, et al. . Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of biomedical research: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med 2016;13:e1002028. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. 10.1136/bmj.n71 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg 2021;88:105906. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906 - DOI - PubMed