Are there sex differences in completeness of death registration and quality of cause of death statistics? Results from a global analysis
- PMID: 34625458
- PMCID: PMC8504355
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006660
Are there sex differences in completeness of death registration and quality of cause of death statistics? Results from a global analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Recent studies suggest that more male than female deaths are registered and a higher proportion of female deaths are certified as 'garbage' causes (ie, vague or ill-defined causes of limited policy value). This can reduce the utility of sex-specific mortality statistics for governments to address health problems. To assess whether there are sex differences in completeness and quality of data from civil registration and vital statistics systems, we analysed available global death registration and cause of death data.
Methods: Completeness of death registration for females and males was compared in 112 countries, and in subsets of countries with incomplete death registration. For 64 countries with medical certificate of cause of death data, the level, severity and type of garbage causes was compared between females and males, standardised for the older age distribution and different cause composition of female compared with male deaths.
Results: For 42 countries with completeness of less than 95% (both sexes), average female completeness was 1.2 percentage points (p.p.) lower (95% uncertainty interval (UI) -2.5 to -0.2 p.p.) than for males. Aggregate female completeness for these countries was 7.1 p.p. lower (95% UI -12.2 to -2.0 p.p.; female 72.9%, male 80.1%), due to much higher male completeness in nine countries including India. Garbage causes were higher for females than males in 58 of 64 countries (statistically significant in 48 countries), but only by an average 1.4 p.p. (1.3-1.6 p.p.); results were consistent by severity and type of garbage.
Conclusion: Although in most countries analysed there was no clear bias against females in death registration, there was clear evidence in a few countries of systematic undercounting of female deaths which substantially reduces the utility of mortality data. In countries with cause of death data, it was only of marginally poorer quality for females than males.
Keywords: health systems; indices of health and disease and standardisation of rates; medical demography; public health.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- GBD 2019 Demographics Collaborators . Global age-sex-specific fertility, mortality, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and population estimates in 204 countries and territories, 1950-2019: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet 2020;396:1160–203. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30977-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- AbouZahr C, Joshi R, Thomas J. Making civil registration and vital statistics systems work for women. knowledge brief series on gender and CRVS: centre of excellence for civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems, 2019.
-
- Cobos Muñoz D, Sant C, Revenga Becedas R. The dangers of gender bias in CRVS and cause of death data: the path to health inequality. Centre of Excellence for Civil Registration and Vital Statistics (CRVS) Systems, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario: Knowledge Brief Series on Gender and CRVS, 2020.
-
- Office of the Registrar General India . Report on medical certification of cause of death, 2018. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Vital Statistics Division, 2020.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources