Use of Community Listening Sessions to Disseminate Research Findings to Past Participants and Communities
- PMID: 34625863
- PMCID: PMC8500252
- DOI: 10.1007/s10900-021-01038-4
Use of Community Listening Sessions to Disseminate Research Findings to Past Participants and Communities
Abstract
The purpose of this sequential, explanatory mixed methods study is to determine changes in attitudes towards research, trust in medical researchers and the process, and willingness to participate in research among African Americans immediately after receiving past study findings in a community listening session (CLS). We developed and implemented four CLSs with a total of 57 African Americans who were either past research participants or members of the community-at-large. In the quantitative (dominant) phase, 32 participants completed pre-post surveys and 10 of those participants completed the follow-up semi-structured interviews. Paired samples t-tests and McNemar's test determined bivariate differences between pre- and post-surveys. Thematic analyses determined emerging themes to further understand these differences. There was a significant increase in: (1) perceived advantages of clinical trials pretest (M = 26.63, SD = 5.43) and post-test (M = 28.53, SD = 4.24, p < .01); and (2) in trust in medical researchers from pre to post (M = 36.16, SD = 10.40 vs. M = 27.53, SD = 9.37, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pre- and post-tests as it relates to perceived disadvantages of clinical trials and willingness to participate. Qualitative analysis yielded the following themes: (1) sharing research results and the impact on attitudes towards research; (2) community listening sessions: a trust building strategy; and (3) satisfaction with the community listening session. Community listening sessions hold promise as a method that researchers can use to simultaneously disseminate research findings and positively impact research perceptions and potentially participation among racial and ethnic minorities.
Keywords: Community; Dissemination; Listening session; Past research participants; Trust.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
A pilot study of a culturally-appropriate, educational intervention to increase participation in cancer clinical trials among African Americans and Latinos.Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Sep;32(9):953-963. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01449-7. Epub 2021 May 27. Cancer Causes Control. 2021. PMID: 34046808 Free PMC article.
-
Engagement of community stakeholders to develop a framework to guide research dissemination to communities.Health Expect. 2020 Aug;23(4):958-968. doi: 10.1111/hex.13076. Epub 2020 May 25. Health Expect. 2020. PMID: 32452067 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding Multilevel Factors Related to Urban Community Trust in Healthcare and Research.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 6;16(18):3280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183280. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31500126 Free PMC article.
-
Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials.Medicine (Baltimore). 2008 Jan;87(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181625d78. Medicine (Baltimore). 2008. PMID: 18204365
-
Why are African Americans under-represented in medical research studies? Impediments to participation.Ethn Health. 1997 Mar-Jun;2(1-2):31-45. doi: 10.1080/13557858.1997.9961813. Ethn Health. 1997. PMID: 9395587 Review.
Cited by
-
How do study participants want to be informed about study results: Findings from a malaria trial in Cambodia, Ethiopia, Pakistan, and Indonesia.J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Mar 27;9(1):e83. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.56. eCollection 2025. J Clin Transl Sci. 2025. PMID: 40391130 Free PMC article.
-
Addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in rural communities: A case study in engaging trusted messengers to pivot and plan.Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;11:1059067. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1059067. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36844863 Free PMC article.
-
Community perspectives on cancer and cancer research: findings from listening sessions with diverse groups in Philadelphia.Discov Public Health. 2025;22(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12982-025-00713-4. Epub 2025 Jun 9. Discov Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40503391 Free PMC article.
-
Conceptualizing and Measuring Trust, Mistrust, and Distrust: Implications for Advancing Health Equity and Building Trustworthiness.Annu Rev Public Health. 2024 May;45(1):465-484. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-061022-044737. Epub 2024 Apr 3. Annu Rev Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38100649 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current global practice and implications for future research on disseminating health research results to study participants: A systematic review.PLoS Med. 2025 Aug 14;22(8):e1004569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004569. eCollection 2025 Aug. PLoS Med. 2025. PMID: 40811427 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tetroe JM, Graham ID, Foy R, Robinson N, Eccles MP, Wensing M, Durieux P, Légaré F, Nielson CP, Adily A, Ward JE, Porter C, Shea B, Grimshaw JM. Health research funding agencies' support and promotion of knowledge translation: An international study. Milbank Quarterly. 2008;86(1):125–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00515.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous