Combined lengthening for acquired leg length discrepancy: Are there advantages of hydroxyapatite-coated intramedullary nails?
- PMID: 34628087
- DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103101
Combined lengthening for acquired leg length discrepancy: Are there advantages of hydroxyapatite-coated intramedullary nails?
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this multicenter prospective study was to analyze the outcomes of bone lengthening by external fixator associated with flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) in acquired limb length discrepancy (LLD).
Hypothesis: Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated FIN enables reduced External Fixation Index in limb lengthening for acquired leg length discrepancies in comparison to non-HA-coated FIN.
Material and methods: This study included 54 patients (mean age, 17.9 years) operated on for femoral or tibial lengthening by combined technique (External fixator with FIN) for acquired length discrepancy. Titanium non-HA-coated FIN (29 cases) or HA-coated FIN (25 cases) were used. The factors that might influence external fixation index, complication occurrence and outcome were analyzed: age, amount of lengthening, nail diameter, HA-coating vs. non-HA-coated nails.
Results: The mean External Fixation Indexes (EFI) of groups compared for non-HA-coated nails vs. HA-coated nails were not significantly different: 26.5 d/cm and 27.2 d/cm in femoral lengthening and 34.9 d/cm and 31.7 d/cm in tibial lengthening. Positive correlation between the "nail diameter/inner distance between cortices at osteotomy site" ratio and EFI in tibial lengthening was revealed (p=0.034). The nail types and the "nail diameter/medullary canal diameter" ratio interact and have significant simultaneous effect on EFI in femoral lengthening (p=0.021).
Discussion: The results of this study revealed no differences with regards to EFI using HA-coated or non-HA-coated titanium FIN in lengthening for acquired leg-length discrepancies. Combined technique allowed reduced EFI and avoided major complications. Both non-HA-nail and HA-coated nail lengthening provided good and excellent outcomes.
Level of evidence: III; (controlled trial without randomization) prospective comparative study.
Keywords: Flexible intramedullary nailing; Hydroxyapatite; Limb lengthening.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Limb Lengthening for Congenital Deficiencies Using External Fixation Combined With Flexible Intramedullary Nailing: A Multicenter Study.J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 Jul 1;41(6):e439-e447. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001816. J Pediatr Orthop. 2021. PMID: 33782369
-
What Are the Potential Benefits and Risks of Using Magnetically Driven Antegrade Intramedullary Lengthening Nails for Femoral Lengthening to Treat Leg Length Discrepancy?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Apr 1;480(4):790-803. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002036. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022. PMID: 34780384 Free PMC article.
-
Lower limb lengthening over an intramedullary nail: a long-term follow-up study of 28 cases.J Orthop Traumatol. 2019 Sep 10;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s10195-019-0538-y. J Orthop Traumatol. 2019. PMID: 31506759 Free PMC article.
-
The use of flexible intramedullary nails in limb lengthening.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017 Sep;14(9):741-753. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1367284. Epub 2017 Aug 18. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017. PMID: 28817981 Review.
-
An update on the intramedullary implant in limb lengthening: A quinquennial review Part 1: The further influence of the intramedullary nail in limb lengthening.Injury. 2022 Nov;53 Suppl 3:S81-S87. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.06.028. Epub 2022 Jun 22. Injury. 2022. PMID: 35768325 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials