Validation of a Cost-effective Cast Saw Simulation-based Educational Module to Improve Cast Removal Safety
- PMID: 34629432
- DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001987
Validation of a Cost-effective Cast Saw Simulation-based Educational Module to Improve Cast Removal Safety
Abstract
Background: Inexperience in cast removal in the pediatric population can lead to a range of cast saw-related injuries. The purpose of this study is to validate a simple simulation-based wax model that is both reproducible and economical while providing a valuable tool that can be used to grade cast saw use performance in trainees.
Methods: Cylindrical wax models were used as an analog for a pediatric upper extremity. The wax models were casted in a proscribed reproducible fashion for consistency. Two groups, the first consisting of 15 experienced cast saw users and the second consisting of 15 inexperienced individuals, completed 4 sequential longitudinal cuts in the casted wax models. After removal of the cast material, marks left by the cast saw in the wax were counted and measured. Indentation length, maximum depth, and maximum width were measured on each wax model. The total length of the cast saw indentations per cast saw user was also calculated.
Results: For the inexperienced cast saw users, the average total length of the cast saw indentations was 526.56 mm, average maximum depth was 1.91 mm, and average maximum width was 3.24 mm. For experienced cast saw users, the average total length of the cast saw indentations was 156.57 mm with an average maximum depth of 1.06 mm and average maximum width of 2.19 mm. Receiver operating characteristic curves of the total number of errors, total error length, maximum error depth, and maximum error width show effective discrimination of experienced from inexperienced trainees.
Conclusions: This study provides valid evidence supporting a cost-effective, time-efficient, and easily reproducible educational simulation module that can objectively measure cast saw the performance in trainees. This model demonstrates construct validity and can distinguish novice from experienced cast saw users. It is sensitive enough to identify mistakes even in the most experienced cast saw users, creating a platform that can provide performance-based feedback to cast saw users of all experience levels.
Level of evidence: Level III-diagnostic test.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Puddy AC, Sunkin JA, Aden JK, et al. Cast saw burns: evaluation of simple techniques for reducing the risk of thermal injury. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34:e63–e66.
-
- Bae DS, Valim C, Connell P, et al. Bivalved versus circumferential cast immobilization for displaced forearm fractures: a randomized clinical trial to assess efficacy and safety. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017;37:239–246.
-
- Bae DS. Pediatric distal radius and forearm fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:1911–1923.
-
- Difazio RL, Harris M, Feldman L, et al. Reducing the incidence of cast-related skin complications in children treated with cast immobilization. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017;37:526–531.
-
- Halanski MA. How to avoid cast saw complications. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(suppl 1):S1–S5.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
