Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov;22(5):1329.
doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10764. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

Modern markers for evaluating bone disease in multiple myeloma (Review)

Affiliations
Review

Modern markers for evaluating bone disease in multiple myeloma (Review)

Vlad Pop et al. Exp Ther Med. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a bone marrow neoplasia with increasing incidence compared to previous years. Although new therapeutic molecules have been introduced, it remains an incurable disease with severe repercussions to patients. For many patients, bone disease represents a severe problem often causing pain, pathological bone fractures, and spinal cord compression, which affects the quality of life. This article analyzes the main markers of bone destruction in MM as well as risk factors for severe bone damage. Bone complications have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients with MM, along with other associated complications (renal failure, hypogammaglobulinemia, osteolytic bone disease, hypercalcemia, anemia). The markers of bone destruction described in this article include: interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), amino- and carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX, CTX), human bone sialoprotein (BSP) and dickkopf-1 secreted glycoprotein (DKK1). The future practical applicability of this literature review would be the large-scale determination of markers of bone destruction that correlate with the negative evolution to complications of bone disease or the implications that these markers have in regards to treatment.

Keywords: ALP; IL-6; RANKL; TNF-α; multiple myeloma; β-CTx.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Mohan M, Kumar M, Samant R, Van Hemert R Jr, Tian E, Desai S, van Rhee F, Thanendrarajan S, Schinke C, Suva LJ, et al. Bone remineralization of lytic lesions in multiple myeloma-the Arkansas experience. Bone. 2021;146(115876) doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.115876. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martino A, Buda G, Maggini V, Lapi F, Lupia A, Di Bello D, Orciuolo E, Galimberti S, Barale R, Petrini M, Rossi AM. Could age modify the effect of genetic variants in IL6 and TNF-α genes in multiple myeloma? Leuk Res. 2012;36:594–597. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2012.02.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clay-Gilmour AI, Hildebrandt MAT, Brown EE, Hofmann JN, Spinelli JJ, Giles GG, Cozen W, Bhatti P, Wu X, Waller RG, et al. Coinherited genetics of multiple myeloma and its precursor, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood Adv. 2020;4:2789–2797. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001435. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gaudio A, Xourafa A, Rapisarda R, Zanoli L, Signorelli SS, Castellino P. Hematological diseases and osteoporosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(3538) doi: 10.3390/ijms21103538. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auzina D, Erts R, Lejniece S. Prognostic value of the bone turnover markers in multiple myeloma. Exp Oncol. 2017;39:53–56. - PubMed