Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;11(10):443.
doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02973-8. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

RNAi-mediated silencing of PEX6 and GAS1 g enes of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici confers resistance against Fusarium wilt in tomato

Affiliations

RNAi-mediated silencing of PEX6 and GAS1 g enes of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici confers resistance against Fusarium wilt in tomato

Meenakshi Tetorya et al. 3 Biotech. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

In the present study, we have explored the potential of the RNAi mediated silencing of genes encoding peroxisomal biogenesis factor and β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) to confer resistance to Fusarium wilt in transgenic tomato plants. The partial gene fragments from these genes were utilized independently to generate hairpin RNAi constructs in appropriate silencing vectors and used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato. The presence of gene-specific siRNAs was confirmed by stem-loop RT-PCR analysis of selected transgenic tomato lines. Transgenic lines expressing gene-specific dsRNA displayed enhanced resistance to Fol with delayed development of disease symptoms. The survival rate of transgenic tomato lines after fungal infection was higher as compared to that of the untransformed tomato plants.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-021-02973-8.

Keywords: Fungal resistance; Fusarium oxysporum; Gene silencing; RNA interference; Tomato.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis for detection of FoPEX6-RNAi and FoGAS1-RNAi transcripts in transgenic tomato lines. Expression of transcripts was normalized with Actin gene from tomato. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed by utilizing total RNA from PCR positive transgenic tomato lines a FoPEX6-RNAi and b FoGAS1-RNAi, M—100 bp DNA Ladder, Lane 2—WT (wild-type) control, 3–8 RNAi tomato lines
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Detection of siRNAs in transgenic tomato lines a FoPEX6-RNAi and b FoGAS1-RNAi tomato lines showing siRNAs. Lane 1-ULM (Ultra low molecular weight markers), Lane 2-WT (Wild-type) control, Lanes 3–8 transgenic tomato lines
Fig.3
Fig.3
Fungal resistance assay with FoPEX6-RNAi and FoGAS1-RNAi transgenic tomato lines. Experiments were performed by inoculating the roots with fungal spores and disease severity index (DI) values were determined after 3 weeks for the transgenic lines relative to the wild-type control plants. DI values for wild-type control plants were recorded as 1.0, whereas transgenic lines have shown DI values ranging from 0.2 to 0.7; a lines 45 and 56 of FoPEX6RNAi with DI values ranging from 0.25 to 0.5 were 70–80% resistant. In contrast, line 46 was significantly less resistant with DI of 0.7 (30% resistant); b similarly, lines 7 and 15 of FoGAS1RNAi with DI values ranging from 0.3 to 0.5 were 70–80% resistant, while line 14 was 45–50% resistant with DI of 0.65; c Assessment of RNAi transgenic tomato lines for resistance against Fusarium wilt. Photographs were taken 3-week post-inoculation. Tomato seedlings (6 each from the wild-type and transgenic lines) were used for fungal resistance assays
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Invasive growth of F. oxysporum on transgenic tomato fruits. a Inoculation was performed by injecting 103 microconidia/ml into wild-type and RNAi lines. The photographs were taken after incubation for 6 days at 26 °C and 90% RH. (i) H2O Only, (ii) Wild-type control tomato fruits, (iii) and (iv) FoPEX6RNAi and FoGAS1RNAi tomato fruit infected with microconidia; b Relative lesion sizes of the infected transgenic tomato fruits were measured 6 day post-inoculation (dpi) using the ImageJ software. Error bars indicate the standard deviations (s.d.) of 12 samples

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Caracuel Z, Martinez-Rocha AL, Di Pietro A, Madrid MP, Roncero MI. Fusarium oxysporum GAS1 encodes a putative β-1, 3- glucanosyltransferase required for virulence on tomato plants. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2005;18:1140–1147. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-18-1140. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 1990;12:13–15.
    1. Fairbairn DJ, Cavallaro AS, Bernard M, Mahalinga-Iyer J, Graham MW, Botella JR. Host-delivered RNAi: an effective strategy to silence genes in plant parasitic nematodes. Planta. 2007;226:1525–1533. doi: 10.1007/s00425-007-0588-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gebremichael DE, Haile ZM, Negrini F, Sabbadini S, Capriotti L, Mezzetti B, Baraldi E. RNA interference strategies for future management of plant pathogenic fungi: prospects and challenges. Plants. 2021 doi: 10.20944/preprints202103.0179.v1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ghag SB, Shekhawat UKS, Ganapathi TR. Host induced post-transcriptional hairpin RNA mediated gene silencing of vital fungal genes confers efficient resistance against Fusarium wilt in banana. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12:541–553. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12158. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources