Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review of worldwide experience after 20 years
- PMID: 34631467
- PMCID: PMC8474989
- DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i9.659
Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review of worldwide experience after 20 years
Abstract
Background: Twenty years after its first use in a patient with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), the results confirm that deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapy for patients with severe and resistant forms of the disorder. Nevertheless, many unknowns remain, including the optimal anatomical targets, the best stimulation parameters, the long-term (LT) effects of the therapy, and the clinical or biological factors associated with response. This systematic review of the articles published to date on DBS for OCD assesses the short and LT efficacy of the therapy and seeks to identify predictors of response.
Aim: To summarize the existing knowledge on the efficacy and tolerability of DBS in treatment-resistant OCD.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to December 31, 2020, using the following strategy: "(Obsessive-compulsive disorder OR OCD) AND (deep brain stimulation OR DBS)." Clinical trials and observational studies published in English and evaluating the effectiveness of DBS for OCD in humans were included and screened for relevant information using a standardized collection tool. The inclusion criteria were as follows: a main diagnosis of OCD, DBS conducted for therapeutic purposes and variation in symptoms of OCD measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) as primary outcome. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.
Results: Forty articles identified by the search strategy met the eligibility criteria. Applying a follow-up threshold of 36 mo, 29 studies (with 230 patients) provided information on short-term (ST) response to DBS in, while 11 (with 155 patients) reported results on LT response. Mean follow-up period was 18.5 ± 8.0 mo for the ST studies and 63.7 ± 20.7 mo for the LT studies. Overall, the percentage of reduction in Y-BOCS scores was similar in ST (47.4%) and LT responses (47.2%) to DBS, but more patients in the LT reports met the criteria for response (defined as a reduction in Y-BOCS scores > 35%: ST, 60.6% vs LT, 70.7%). According to the results, the response in the first year predicts the extent to which an OCD patient will benefit from DBS, since the maximum symptom reduction was achieved in most responders in the first 12-14 mo after implantation. Reports indicate a consistent tendency for this early improvement to be maintained to the mid-term for most patients; but it is still controversial whether this improvement persists, increases or decreases in the long term. Three different patterns of LT response emerged from the analysis: 49.5% of patients had good and sustained response to DBS, 26.6% were non responders, and 22.5% were partial responders, who might improve at some point but experience relapses during follow-up. A significant improvement in depressive symptoms and global functionality was observed in most studies, usually (although not always) in parallel with an improvement in obsessive symptoms. Most adverse effects of DBS were mild and transient and improved after adjusting stimulation parameters; however, some severe adverse events including intracranial hemorrhages and infections were also described. Hypomania was the most frequently reported psychiatric side effect. The relationship between DBS and suicide risk is still controversial and requires further study. Finally, to date, no clear clinical or biological predictors of response can be established, probably because of the differences between studies in terms of the neuroanatomical targets and stimulation protocols assessed.
Conclusion: The present review confirms that DBS is a promising therapy for patients with severe resistant OCD, providing both ST and LT evidence of efficacy.
Keywords: Deep brain stimulation; Long-term; Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Predictors of response; Short-term; Side effects.
©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Long-term comparative effectiveness of deep brain stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder.Brain Stimul. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):1128-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.07.050. Epub 2022 Aug 1. Brain Stimul. 2022. PMID: 35926783
-
Efficacy of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Anterior Limb of the Internal Capsule for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Clinical Cohort of 70 Patients.Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 1;177(3):265-271. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19060656. Epub 2020 Jan 7. Am J Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 31906709
-
Long-Term Deep Brain Stimulation in Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Outcome and Quality of Life at Four to Eight Years Follow-Up.Neuromodulation. 2021 Feb;24(2):324-330. doi: 10.1111/ner.13232. Epub 2020 Jul 15. Neuromodulation. 2021. PMID: 32667114
-
Efficacy, Effect on Mood Symptoms, and Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation in Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 May 26;81(3):19r12821. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19r12821. J Clin Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 32459406
-
Deep brain stimulation versus ablative surgery for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis.Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 Apr;143(4):307-318. doi: 10.1111/acps.13276. Epub 2021 Feb 11. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021. PMID: 33492682 Review.
Cited by
-
Qualitative studies involving users of clinical neurotechnology: a scoping review.BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 14;25(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01087-z. BMC Med Ethics. 2024. PMID: 39138452 Free PMC article.
-
Dual bilateral stimulation of the nucleus accumbens and the centromedian thalamus for treatment of intractable Tourette syndrome.Surg Neurol Int. 2025 May 30;16:206. doi: 10.25259/SNI_379_2025. eCollection 2025. Surg Neurol Int. 2025. PMID: 40469343 Free PMC article.
-
Optogenetic Low-Frequency Stimulation of Principal Neurons, but Not Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons, Prevents Generation of Ictal Discharges in Rodent Entorhinal Cortex in an In Vitro 4-Aminopyridine Model.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 22;24(1):195. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010195. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36613660 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanisms and interventions promoting healthy frontostriatal dynamics in obsessive-compulsive disorder.Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 11;16(1):7400. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62190-2. Nat Commun. 2025. PMID: 40790029 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Efficacy of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric and Cognitive Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review.JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 May 26;12:e45213. doi: 10.2196/45213. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023. PMID: 37234039 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th ed. (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub, 2013.
-
- Pérez-Vigil A, Fernández de la Cruz L, Brander G, Isomura K, Jangmo A, Feldman I, Hesselmark E, Serlachius E, Lázaro L, Rück C, Kuja-Halkola R, D'Onofrio BM, Larsson H, Mataix-Cols D. Association of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder With Objective Indicators of Educational Attainment: A Nationwide Register-Based Sibling Control Study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75:47–55. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Pallanti S, Quercioli L. Treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: methodological issues, operational definitions and therapeutic lines. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006;30:400–412. - PubMed
-
- Brock H, Hany M. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. In: Stat Pearls. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing, 2020. - PubMed