Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 2;44(2-3):359-387.
doi: 10.1007/s40614-021-00307-w. eCollection 2021 Sep.

What Can We Learn by Treating Perspective Taking as Problem Solving?

Affiliations

What Can We Learn by Treating Perspective Taking as Problem Solving?

Tokiko Taylor et al. Perspect Behav Sci. .

Abstract

Perspective taking has been studied extensively using a wide variety of experimental tasks. The theoretical constructs that are used to develop these tasks and interpret the results obtained from them, most notably theory of mind (ToM), have conceptual shortcomings from a behavior-analytic perspective. The behavioral approach to conceptualizing and studying this class of behavior is parsimonious and pragmatic, but the body of relevant research is currently small. The prominent relational frame theory (RFT) approach to derived perspective taking asserts that "deictic framing" is a core component of this class of behavior, but this proposal also appears to be conceptually problematic. We suggest that in many cases perspective taking is problem solving; when successful, both classes of behavior involve the emission of context-appropriate precurrent behavior that facilitates the appropriate response (i.e., the "solution"). Conceptualizing perspective taking in this way appears to have many advantages, which we explore herein.

Keywords: deictic framing; mind reading; precurrent behavior; stimulus control; theory of mind; visual perspective taking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of InterestsWe have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aichhorn M, Perner J, Kronbichler M, Staffen W, Ladurner G. Do visual perspective tasks need theory of mind? Neuroimage. 2006;30(3):1059–1068. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson JR, Montant M, Schmitt D. Rhesus monkeys fail to use gaze direction as an experimenter-given cue in an object-choice task. Behavioural Processes. 1996;37(1):47–55. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00074-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson JR, Sallaberry P, Barbier H. Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by capuchin monkeys. Animal Behaviour. 1995;49(1):201–208. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80168-5. - DOI
    1. Andrews G, Halford GS, Boyce J. Conditional discrimination in young children: The roles of associative and relational processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2012;112(1):84–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.12.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews G, Halford GS, Bunch KM, Bowden D, Jones T. Theory of mind and relational complexity. Child Development. 2003;74(5):1476–1499. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00618. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources