Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 8;3(3):378-385.
doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa035. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Physicians' strategies for using family history data: having the data is not the same as using the data

Affiliations

Physicians' strategies for using family history data: having the data is not the same as using the data

Peter Taber et al. JAMIA Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To identify needs in a clinical decision support tool development by exploring how primary care providers currently collect and use family health history (FHH).

Design: Survey questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were administered to a mix of primary and specialty care clinicians within the University of Utah Health system (40 surveys, 12 interviews).

Results: Three key themes emerged regarding providers' collection and use of FHH: (1) Strategies for collecting FHH vary by level of effort; (2) Documentation practices extend beyond the electronic health record's dedicated FHH module; and (3) Providers desire feedback from genetic services consultation and are uncertain how to refer patients to genetic services.

Conclusion: Study findings highlight the varying degrees of engagement that providers have with collecting FHH. Improving the integration of FHH into workflow, and providing decision support, as well as links and tools to help providers better utilize genetic counseling may improve patient care.

Keywords: clinical decision support; electronic health record; family health history; qualitative; survey; workflow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Provider-reported frequency of family health history collection by cancer type.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vogenberg FR, Barash CI, Pursel M. Personalized medicine: part 3: challenges facing health care plans in implementing coverage policies for pharmacogenomic and genetic testing. P T 2010; 35 (12): 670–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahon SM. The three-generation pedigree: a critical tool in cancer genetics care. Oncol Nurs Forum 2016; 43 (5): 655–60. - PubMed
    1. Lowery JT, Ahnen DJ, Schroy PC 3rd, et al. Understanding the contribution of family history to colorectal cancer risk and its clinical implications: a state-of-the-science review. Cancer 2016; 122 (17): 2633–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations). Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2012.
    1. Hwang SW, Kwak MS, Kim WS, et al. Influence of a positive family history on the clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2016; 10 (9): 1024–32. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources