Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 6;7(4):275-279.
doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.11.003. eCollection 2021 Oct.

Factors predictive of an academic otolaryngologist's scholarly impact

Courtney B Shires  1 , Theodore D Klug  1 , Ryan K Meacham  2 , Merry E Sebelik  3
Affiliations

Factors predictive of an academic otolaryngologist's scholarly impact

Courtney B Shires et al. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: Describe the h index as a bibliometric that can be utilized to objectively evaluate scholarly impact. Identify which otolaryngology subspecialties are the most scholarly. Describe if NIH funding to one's choice of medical school, residency, or fellowship has any impact on one's scholarly output. Determine other factors predictive of an academic otolaryngologist's productivity.

Study design: Analysis of bibliometric data of academic otolaryngologists.

Methods: Active grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to otolaryngology departments were ascertained via the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Reports database. Faculty listings from these departments were gleaned from departmental websites. H index was calculated using the Scopus database.

Results: Forty-seven otolaryngology programs were actively receiving NIH funding. There were 838 faculty members from those departments who had a mean h index of 9.61. Otology (h index 12.50) and head and neck (h index 11.96) were significantly (P < 0.0001) more scholarly than the rest of subspecialists. H index was significantly correlative (P < 0.0001) with degree of NIH funding at a given institution. H index was not significantly higher for those that attended medical school (P < 0.18), residency (P < 0.16), and fellowship (P < 0.16) at institutions with NIH funding to otolaryngology departments.

Conclusions: H index is a bibliometric that can be used to assess scholarly impact. Otology and head and neck are the most scholarly subspecialists within otolaryngology. NIH funding to an individual's medical school, residency, or fellowship of origin is not correlative with one's scholarly impact, but current institutional affiliation and choice of subspecialty are.

Keywords: Bibliometric; Citation; Impact; h-index.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean H index per otolaryngology subspecialty.
Figure 2
Figure 2
H index per academic rank.
Figure 3
Figure 3
H index of individuals in NIH Funded otolaryngology departments.
Figure 4
Figure 4
H index stratified according to presence of NIH funding to otolaryngology departments affiliated with each phase of one’s training.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McGaghie W.C., Thompson J.A. America’s best medical schools: a critique of the U.S. News & World Report rankings. Acad Med. 2001;76:985–992. - PubMed
    1. Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:16569–16572. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirsch J.E. Does the H index have predictive power. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:19193–19198. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wendl M.C. H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature. 2007;449:403. - PubMed
    1. Mishra D.C. Citations: rankings weigh against developing nations. Nature. 2008;451:244. - PubMed