The Dangers of Using Cq to Quantify Nucleic Acid in Biological Samples: A Lesson From COVID-19
- PMID: 34633030
- DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab219
The Dangers of Using Cq to Quantify Nucleic Acid in Biological Samples: A Lesson From COVID-19
Abstract
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA quantities, measured by reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), have been proposed to stratify clinical risk or determine analytical performance targets. We investigated reproducibility and how setting diagnostic cutoffs altered the clinical sensitivity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing.
Methods: Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 RNA distributions [quantification cycle (Cq) and copies/mL] from more than 6000 patients from 3 clinical laboratories in United Kingdom, Belgium, and the Republic of Korea were analyzed. Impact of Cq cutoffs on clinical sensitivity was assessed. The June/July 2020 INSTAND external quality assessment scheme SARS-CoV-2 materials were used to estimate laboratory reported copies/mL and to estimate the variation in copies/mL for a given Cq.
Results: When the WHO-suggested Cq cutoff of 25 was applied, the clinical sensitivity dropped to about 16%. Clinical sensitivity also dropped to about 27% when a simulated limit of detection of 106 copies/mL was applied. The interlaboratory variation for a given Cq value was >1000 fold in copies/mL (99% CI).
Conclusion: While RT-qPCR has been instrumental in the response to COVID-19, we recommend Cq (cycle threshold or crossing point) values not be used to set clinical cutoffs or diagnostic performance targets due to poor interlaboratory reproducibility; calibrated copy-based units (used elsewhere in virology) offer more reproducible alternatives. We also report a phenomenon where diagnostic performance may change relative to the effective reproduction number. Our findings indicate that the disparities between patient populations across time are an important consideration when evaluating or deploying diagnostic tests. This is especially relevant to the emergency situation of an evolving pandemic.
Keywords: RT-qPCR; SARS-CoV-2; cycle threshold; quantification cycle.
© American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2021.
Comment in
-
Cq Values Do Not Reflect Nucleic Acid Quantity in Biological Samples.Clin Chem. 2021 Dec 30;68(1):7-9. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab236. Clin Chem. 2021. PMID: 34677605 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
From crisis to routine - Standardization of SARS-CoV-2 genome detection by enhanced EQA schemes in a scientific pandemic network.Int J Med Microbiol. 2025 Jun;319:151656. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2025.151656. Epub 2025 May 24. Int J Med Microbiol. 2025. PMID: 40479806
-
[Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods on SARS-CoV-2 Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Results].Mikrobiyol Bul. 2023 Oct;57(4):597-607. doi: 10.5578/mb.20239948. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2023. PMID: 37885388 Turkish.
-
Analytical and Clinical Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in the Detection and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2.Mol Diagn Ther. 2021 Sep;25(5):617-628. doi: 10.1007/s40291-021-00547-1. Epub 2021 Jul 28. Mol Diagn Ther. 2021. PMID: 34319580 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3(3):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7:CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3. PMID: 33760236 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013718. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33502003 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Simultaneous monitoring of eight human respiratory viruses including SARS-CoV-2 using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 4;12(1):13392. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16250-y. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35927299 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the human rhinovirus co-infection in patients with asthma exacerbations and COVID-19.Pharm Pract (Granada). 2022 Apr-Jun;20(2):2665. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2022.2.2665. Epub 2022 May 2. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2022. PMID: 35919804 Free PMC article.
-
Serum SARS-CoV-2 Antigens for the Determination of COVID-19 Severity.Viruses. 2022 Jul 28;14(8):1653. doi: 10.3390/v14081653. Viruses. 2022. PMID: 36016276 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical comparison of three SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests for routine diagnostic testing.Heliyon. 2023 Nov 7;9(11):e22112. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22112. eCollection 2023 Nov. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38034696 Free PMC article.
-
Standardization and Comparison of Emergency Use Authorized COVID-19 Assays and Testing Laboratories.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Nov 8:2023.11.08.23297633. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.08.23297633. medRxiv. 2023. PMID: 37986832 Free PMC article. Preprint.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous