Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;35(3):329-348.
doi: 10.1111/cla.12353. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

Revising the Bantu tree

Affiliations
Free article

Revising the Bantu tree

Peter M Whiteley et al. Cladistics. 2019 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Phylogenetic methods offer a promising advance for the historical study of language and cultural relationships. Applications to date, however, have been hampered by traditional approaches dependent on unfalsifiable authority statements: in this regard, historical linguistics remains in a similar position to evolutionary biology prior to the cladistic revolution. Influential phylogenetic studies of Bantu languages over the last two decades, which provide the foundation for multiple analyses of Bantu sociocultural histories, are a major case in point. Comparative analyses of basic lexica, instead of directly treating written words, use only numerical symbols that express non-replicable authority opinion about underlying relationships. Building on a previous study of Uto-Aztecan, here we analyse Bantu language relationships with methods deriving from DNA sequence optimization algorithms, treating basic vocabulary as sequences of sounds. This yields finer-grained results that indicate major revisions to the Bantu tree, and enables more robust inferences about the history of Bantu language expansion and/or migration throughout sub-Saharan Africa. "Early-split" versus "late-split" hypotheses for East and West Bantu are tested, and overall results are compared to trees based on numerical reductions of vocabulary data. Reconstruction of language histories is more empirically based and robust than with previous methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alves, I., Coelho, M., Gignoux, C., Damasceno, A., Prista, A., Rocha, J., 2007. Genetic homogeneity across Bantu-speaking groups from Mozambique and Angola challenges early split scenarios between East and West Bantu populations. Hum. Biol. 83, 13-38.
    1. Barbançon, F., Warnow, T., Evans, S.N., Ringe, D., Nakhleh, L., 2013. An experimental study comparing linguistic phylogenetic reconstruction methods. Diachronica 30, 143-170.
    1. Bastin, Y., 2003. The interlacustrine zone (Zone J). In: Nurse, D., Philippson, G. (Eds.), The Bantu Languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 501-528.
    1. Bastin, Y., Piron, P., 1999. Classifications lexicostatistiques: bantou, bantou et bantoïde: de l'intérêt des “groupes flottants”. In: Hombert, J.-M., Hyman, L.M. (Eds.), Bantu Historical Linguistics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. CSLI, Stanford, pp. 149-163.
    1. Bastin, Y., Coupez, A., de Halleux, B., 1983. Classification lexicostatistique des langues bantoues (214 relevés). Bulletin des séances de l'Academie Royale des Sciences d'Outre-Mer, nouvelle série 27, 173-199.

LinkOut - more resources