Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0255321.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255321. eCollection 2021.

Larval ecology and bionomics of Anopheles funestus in highland and lowland sites in western Kenya

Affiliations

Larval ecology and bionomics of Anopheles funestus in highland and lowland sites in western Kenya

Isaiah Debrah et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: An. funestus is a major Afrotropical vector of human malaria. This study sought to investigate the larval ecology, sporozoite infection rates and blood meal sources of An. funestus in western Kenya.

Methods: Larval surveys were carried out in Bungoma (Highland) and Kombewa (lowland) of western Kenya. Aquatic habitats were identified, characterized, georeferenced and carefully examined for mosquito larvae and predators. Indoor resting mosquitoes were sampled using pyrethrum spray catches. Adults and larvae were morphologically and molecularly identified to species. Sporozoite infections and blood meal sources were detected using real-time PCR and ELISA respectively.

Results: Of the 151 aquatic habitats assessed, 62/80 (78%) in Bungoma and 58/71(82%) in Kombewa were positive for mosquito larvae. Of the 3,193 larvae sampled, An. funestus larvae constitute 38% (1224/3193). Bungoma recorded a higher number of An. funestus larvae (85%, 95%, CI, 8.722-17.15) than Kombewa (15%, 95%, CI, 1.33-3.91). Molecular identification of larvae showed that 89% (n = 80) were An. funestus. Approximately 59%, 35% and 5% of An. funestus larvae co-existed with An. gambiae s.l, Culex spp and An. coustani in the same habitats respectively. Of 1,221 An. funestus s.l adults sampled, molecular identifications revealed that An. funestus constituted 87% (n = 201) and 88% (n = 179) in Bungoma and Kombewa, respectively. The Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite rate of An. funestus in Bungoma and Kombewa was 2% (3/174) and 1% (2/157), respectively, and the human blood index of An. funestus was 84% (48/57) and 89% (39/44) and for Bungoma and Kombewa, respectively.

Conclusion: Man-made ponds had the highest abundance of An. funestus larvae. Multiple regression and principal component analyses identified the distance to the nearest house as the key environmental factor associated with the abundance of An. funestus larvae in aquatic habitats. This study serves as a guide for the control of An. funestus and other mosquito species to complement existing vector control strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Map of the study areas in western Kenya.
The map was generated using ArcGIS Pro 2.6 software. Map source: ESRI, CGIAR, and USGS (available at: www.esri.com).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Proportion of An. funestus larvae shared with other mosquitoes in the larval habitats.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Distribution of aquatic predators in the various habitats.
Odonata: damselfly/dragonfly, Molluscs: snails/slugs/mussels, Hemiptera: backswimmer/giant water bugs/cacidas, Ephemeroptera: mayfly, Coleoptera: water beetles/weevils, Arachnids: spiders/ticks/mites, Annelids: Segmented worms, Amphibians: frogs/toads/tadpoles, Fish: tilapia.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Association of habitat variables with An. funestus density (A) vegetation (present and absent) and category of vegetation (emergent and non-emergent), (B) aquatic species in the habitats, (C) land use type.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Association of habitat variables with An. funestus larval density (A) distance to the nearest house, (B) predator (present and absent in habitats) and (C) water flow status and water clarity.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Evolutionary relationships of taxa.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO, World malaria report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. 2020.
    1. Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, et al.. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015;526: 207. doi: 10.1038/nature15535 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferguson HM, Dornhaus A, Beeche A, Borgemeister C, Gottlieb M, Mulla MS, et al.. Ecology: a prerequisite for malaria elimination and eradication. PLoS Med. 2010;7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000303 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kitron U, Spielman A. Suppression of transmission of malaria through source reduction: antianopheline measures applied in Israel, the United States, and Italy. Rev Infect Dis. 1989;11: 391–406. doi: 10.1093/clinids/11.3.391 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Killeen GF, McKenzie FE, Foy BD, Schieffelin C, Billingsley PF, Beier JC. The potential impact of integrated malaria transmission control on entomologic inoculation rate in highly endemic areas. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;62: 545–551. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2000.62.545 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types